« Tom Higgins: Busch's move is big, but there have been bigger ones | Main | Contractual obligations and inner-loops »
August 13, 2005
David Green: Only 'chokes' in racing are within the carburetors
EDITOR'S NOTE: There's apparently been a little confusion, which we hope to alleviate here and end when David Green's blog gets officially and actually up and running. This David Green, like the former Busch Series champion and current competitor, has raced some and hails from Kentucky. But this one is a schoolteacher. Both are wonderfully articulate gentlemen and both appear, for all practical purposes, to be absolutlely crazy about this sport you and I love, too.
Here's hoping you enjoy this take from the English teacher as much as we do offering it.
Only 'chokes' in racing are within the carburetors
By DAVID GREEN
A friend and colleague offered the thought the other day that the notion of "choking," long part of the culture in traditional sports, does not exist in auto racing.
Whether you buy into the notion or not, whether you pay anything more than scant attention to baseball, football, basketball or golf, surely you are aware of the derisive accusation of "choking" - a player misses a short putt, blows a wide-open layup, kicks a chip-shot field goal wide right, muffs a soft pop fly or lets a routine ground ball roll between his legs. Sometimes the label is hung on a team, not just an individual, and in a larger context than the single-play bobble (think Atlanta Braves in several World Series appearances in the 1990s).
My friend, I believe, has a point - the concept is all but nonexistent in racing.
Oh, the same things happen. Everybody makes mistakes. The consequences of errors by doctors, airline pilots, soldiers and others involved in life-and-death situations are profound, and sometimes it's a driver's error that may lead to his death or serious injury. Perhaps the elevated level of risk tends to insulate people who take those risks from being susceptible to charges of "choking."
The main factor that separates racing drivers from most other professional athletes is the continuity of most forms of motorsport. The action goes on, uninterrupted except by caution flags. There's never any other suspension of the normal flow of the "game" for the sort of isolated event or individual execution of a specific task that is usually associated with the notion of "choking." Therefore, there's almost never a situation in which a driver could "choke" in the classic sense.
Drag racing, thanks to its format, may offer the best chance for comparison to other sports in this discussion. If a driver with consistently good reaction times somehow fouls or loses because of an uncharacteristically slow start, he or she may be accused of "choking." In other forms of motorized competition, such all-important individual moments just don't occur with the same kind of visibility.
More often than not, an overtaking move in racing is not so much a spontaneous act as it is the culmination of a process the overtaking driver began as much as a full lap earlier, or even before that. I suspect many fans may not realize that. Sometimes, even a seasoned observer or somebody who has done (or tried to do) that sort of thing is surprised. Carl Edwards' race-winning pass of Jimmie Johnson at Atlanta
Did Johnson, then, "choke"? I don't think so. About the only thing he could've done would be to squeeze Edwards high until the challenger backed off or went in the wall. Refraining from doing that is hardly a "choke" in my opinion, although somebody with a more ruthless mindset might disagree.
Probably the closest thing to the classic sports "choke" in racing would be when a guy is pressing too hard to stay in the lead or to catch an opponent, overdrives the car and spins or puts it in the wall. Also, you might compare the idea of a missed shift on a restart or in a race on a road course, but sometimes that's a mechanical issue, not driver execution error.
In most other instances where a driver's misstep, indecision or hesitation might be comparable to another athlete's "choke," nobody but the driver himself realizes what has happened.
August 13, 2005 in Racing | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bce769e200d834527dd553ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference David Green: Only 'chokes' in racing are within the carburetors:
Comments
I think we'll see some chokes today (def: To fail to perform effectively because of nervous agitation or tension, especially in an athletic contest). Drivers less used to the road courses will lose composure when they see the likes of Stewart, the Gordons or the road course ringers in the mirror. And will certainly fail to perform effectively. JMO
Posted by: Keith | Aug 14, 2005 10:09:30 AM
Keith,
You are exactly right, there will be numerous drivers that aren't familiar with the road course and will be intimidated by the drivers that are much more used to road courses and tend to drive more aggresively.
Posted by: Jon | Aug 14, 2005 8:18:20 PM
There were plenty of chokes today mostly caused by the likes of the Gordons (Mostly Robbie), Said and the ringers (Tony was too far ahead to cause much tension). But I like "My" Nascar with races for the lead not fuel or guessing games. And while this was a better train than So-nora it was still a train and the only things that made it interesting were the Gordons and the above mentioned. Ok Mikey owes Kasey one that was ok too. I suppose I just will never like road courses. And God bless Coo Coo and the Marlins and let him get on a good team up there!
Posted by: Keith | Aug 14, 2005 8:31:27 PM
Well, I watched just about all of the Watkins Glen race and I have to say I don't think I saw any driver do anything for which he should have been accused of "choking."
The closest anybody came would have been Boris Said for his hesitation on the restart that led to him losing second to Robby Gordon.
I have to add how much I respect Jeff Burton for taking the blame for his crash, not that the admission came as a surprise. Jeff is one of many classy guys in the sport.
Maybe I'm overly sympathetic to the competitors in all sports, but for the most part, I think the "choking" accusation is unfair -- and usually comes from the media or spectators, not their peers. I don't mean to suggest you guys don't have the right to your judgments, but I wonder how you all might perform under the pressure of competition, and whether you'd think it was fair for observers to criticize you so harshly?
Posted by: David Green | Aug 15, 2005 12:35:07 AM
You're being too defensive of the drivers or too wishy washy...I haven't decided. But yes there was more than 1 driver who choked because his cage was rattled this weekend (And not just Said...who btw may have been justified by R. Gordons statement that Stewart brake checked him also). And duh we pay the big money to these guys in the long run so yes it is our right to criticize harshly. But for you to say it isn't insults us. If they don't want harsh criticism maybe they should be real estate agents etc.
Posted by: Keith | Aug 15, 2005 11:14:41 AM
Thanks for your tip of the hat to Burton, who is one of my favorites. Watching and hearing both him and Michael Waltrip after their accidents made me think back to that infamous day in 1979(?)when a bad pit stop led to David Pearson's losing a tire; soon thereafter, the Wood Brothers showed him the door. One wonders how much patience will be shown by RCR. Can one mistake lead to a firing? I hope not. Waltrip showed the obligatory anger, but more than that, he showed the bitter disappointment resulting from yet another good run gone south on him. I don't know if he has a ride for next year, but if he's auditioning, that had to be really painful.
And, of course, due props to Tony Stewart - one heck of a ride.
Posted by: Doug | Aug 15, 2005 12:26:35 PM
Keith: I specifically wrote, "I don't mean to suggest you guys don't have the right to your judgments," so I'm not sure how you figure you've been insulted or how much more clearly I could have acknowledged your right to your opinion. Rave on, pal. I just wish I had the opportunity to get everybody who cries "choke" out on the racetrack and see how you handle the chaos yourself.
Doug: Yeah, that was 1979, the spring race at Darlington. It was an ignoble end to one of the greatest driver-team combinations in NASCAR history. Pearson is one of my all-time favorites. I first met him in 1966, just after he won the first of his three Grand National titles. But, just like another of my favorites, Bobby Allison, he is a pretty stubborn fellow. That one botched pit stop was not so much the cause of his split with the Woods as it was a "last straw" kind of thing. David's stint in the 21 was the longest of his career with any team.
Posted by: David Green | Aug 16, 2005 6:08:36 AM
David, I'll keep reading because sometimes you have some interesting insight. But on this topic I think you're the one who "choked", pal!
Posted by: Keith | Aug 16, 2005 8:48:20 AM
I'll have to agree. I can't say that i've seen any choking goin on in racing other than Martin choking down a ham sandwich during a rain delay, or some of Nascars poster boys(Johnson&Gordon)choking on their words. But i won't say it doesn't happen. It's just not to the point that we see it on tv or at the track. Either way, the only choke i'm sure i'll see is on the carb, but i'm not sure it's there anymore.
Posted by: lyn | Aug 16, 2005 5:51:10 PM
Post a comment
Advertisements
Subscribe to this blog's feed