« A special trip to Bristol | Main | The racing and other games need to go on »
August 30, 2005
Ratings, racing and restarts
TNT is justifiably proud of its ratings success with NASCAR races. And, as any NASCAR accountant would point out, what's good for business is pretty good for the sport and its fans (with some notable exceptions).
Some fans, it turns out, are a far piece from pleased with what they're seeing on the tube these race days. And some aren't even seeing the races.
Turner Network Television saw its Nextel Cup ratings rise again with Saturday night's Sharpie 500 at Bristol. The numbers were about 15 percent better than last year's and the household count was up to 4.25 million. Previous races this season were also ratings successes, TNT says.
I'm like Jim Utter, at least in this way: I'm still looking for the rest of NASCAR's 75 million fans. This was Bristol, right? Even when you count the 160,000 or so souls at the race, we're still coming up a little short. Unless, of course, all those households TNT is touting were holding big race parties Saturday night.
OK, we won't quibble too much with what NASCAR tells its advertisers just now. Let's just stick with the ratings game.
I've got to wonder what those Bristol ratings would look like had NBC carried the race instead of cable's TNT.
Yes, Virginia, while there is indeed a Santa Claus, cable is still an expense for which many people choose not to sign up. And at this stretch of the season, many of those folks are bothered that NBC won't be getting into NASCAR's Chase game until October, just in time for the UAW-Ford 500 at Talladega.
The Sept. 10 Richmond race, which may well have some final say on who does and doesn't make the Chase? On TNT. Cable.
The first two Chase races? Yup, cable again.
Like I suggested to a reader in an e-mail the other day: You've got three choices if you don't want to spend the money, then have the cable company give you a four-hour window for when they might actually hook you up.
You can plan to visit your in-laws at times that coincide with the races you want to see. You can make peace with that annoying neighbor who still has your chain saw from last winter's ice storm and go see him when the races are on the tube. Or you can find a sports bar within crawling distance of your place.
But any and all of those options, along with signing up and paying for the service, of course, can carry their own set of aggravations.
Restarts that regularly take place while commercials are airing might count as one. Rain delays are easily another.
And, everyone's favorite: the shameless and seemingly endless self-promotion.
Hey, we like your electric soap box and it's a bully pulpit. But we tuned in to see a race thanks.
August 30, 2005 in Racing | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bce769e200d83454a0a453ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ratings, racing and restarts:
Comments
Amen - I live out in the sticks and my only choice is satellite. Aside from the local news, the only thing I regularly care to watch is the race each weekend. I'd rather have my kids go out outside and find something to do than parking in front of the tv. I'm looking at $30plus/mo just to watch the race. What's NBC showing that's so much more important? I think it was beach volleyball or some garbage during Michigan the week before. Seems crazy with the draw the races have.
Posted by: Andy | Aug 30, 2005 3:38:08 PM
Bob,
If you raced Grandmas on tricycles at Bristol race fans would watch and many more did I think than what they show. Maybe their stats are set more for the new demographics Nascar wants like the busy coasts. Remember they poll like 1000 people for this (usually thru the box now) so if they poll the wrong people they get the wrong answers. Also TIVO, DVR's, Satellites and people just using rabbit ears won't get counted.
Posted by: Keith | Aug 30, 2005 3:53:40 PM
Also I wish Cox cable actually carried the Race in real HDTV...I got the Little League World Series, some really strange Korean Sumo Wrestling, and actually Bocce Ball in HDTV...I want my Nascar!
Posted by: Keith | Aug 30, 2005 4:01:12 PM
If I remember correctly, the first season of this TV deal, were they not glotting about how all but about 3 races were on "regular" television. What happened to that deal?(of course neither Richmond race was included int that).
Posted by: Kevin | Aug 30, 2005 5:53:35 PM
When it comes to which channel the race comes on i like FOX because if i am not mistaken they give FX only 2-3 races each year, while TNT gets atleast 10.
Posted by: 48fan | Aug 30, 2005 7:57:29 PM
Bob,
I forgot the restarts...If Nascar lets TV control the event instead of visa versa how long is it before we get those TV time outs that the NFL has? Also, maybe they'll do it with mandatory pitstops. And there's a question that Jim Utter has yet to explain.
Shhhh I'll blog the question tomorrow and see what comes up.
Posted by: Keith | Aug 30, 2005 9:15:00 PM
Do people not remember when the races were mostly on cable with very few races on CBS? The days of searching which of the stations carried the races this week. ESPN, CBS or the now defunct TNN. I miss Ned but am glad the days of Eli Gold and Buddy ("that car's a rocket ship") Baker are behind us. Why doesn't NASCAR just give us the races start to finish with out commercials, with the announcer of our choice, free interactive in-car cameras and selectable radio chatter to boot all out the goodness of thier hearts? Could it be that it is a business and they are only in it to make money?
Posted by: Todd | Aug 31, 2005 2:25:35 AM
Some of us remember when the only races on TV at all were the Daytona's and the other major tracks...then cable came and said, "We can make you money and expand the sport."...Then broadcast TV said,"We need a piece of that!"...And now broadcast TV is usually found on cable systems. The bottom line is that Nascar wants the "Big Bucks" so they can have those big purses and line the coffers. No foul there they are a business. Broadcast TV has to put up the bucks if they want to compete with cable and get the show back.
Posted by: Keith | Aug 31, 2005 10:10:01 AM
Commercials are a necessary evil to pay the bills. Deal with it. Need more commercials? Extend that yellow for another lap! I wonder when we'll start getting the option of pay-per-view NASCAR races, commercial free. Would YOU pay to watch the Daytona 500 commercial-free? I might, if the price were right. Hey, give me my PC with Track Pass, a 50" HD TV, and I'll make do for the day! I would NOT pay to watch New Hampshire or Chicago, but maybe Bristol?
Posted by: Doug | Aug 31, 2005 12:32:59 PM
NASCAR does not have 75 million fans - that figure is a bald-faced promotional lie.
As for ratings rises this year, I'm frankly dumbfounded, because the racing is worse now than it was last year. Just what are people tuning in to see in these races?
Posted by: Mike Daly | Aug 31, 2005 2:30:42 PM
Mike Daly,
You already know that answer...we watch because every event has potential for excitement. Kind of like Daytona...We don't wish for the "Big One" but we know it could happen so we're riveted to the tube. But I agree with you that for this season (with some notable exceptions) we could have filmed IMAX "How to Pass on Pitroad" in all it's cinemascopic splendor.
Posted by: Keith | Aug 31, 2005 4:51:45 PM
I think a major part of the reason people don't watch the races in the numbers expected is the endless commercials. I understand TNT has to pay the bills but it's outright ridiculous anymore. I taped the Bristol race because I was out of town and it took me about an hour and a half to watch a four hour race. Why should people even bother?
Posted by: KurtDman24 | Aug 31, 2005 7:37:35 PM
Commercials are a necessary evil, unfortunately. I hate it during a ball game when we miss the first pitch of an inning because of the commercials; and a one hour tv show carries 15 minutes of commercials. I do, however, like the way that ABC handles their coverage--side by side. They get their commercials in but you can still watch what's happening during the race. Were the ratings higher when Fox carried the races? I know a lot of race fans who hate the TNT/NBC coverage and prefer Fox's.
Posted by: tn865linda | Sep 2, 2005 11:21:13 AM
Great article, Bob! You covered many of the issues I've been complaining with TV coverage this year (the top one being the networks not carrying if we see restarts anymore).
Todd wrote:
>The days of searching which >of the stations carried the races this
>week.
Excuse me, but a real race fan didn't have to "search" for which network was showing the race; they knew. Or maybe, you could actually look at a TV guide. That sounds like you are just parroting the crap NASCAR gave us to rationalize dumping ESPN and TNN.
Mike Daly wrote:
>As for ratings rises this year, I'm >frankly dumbfounded, because the racing is >worse now than it was last year. Just what >are people tuning in to see in these races?
Me too. All I can think of is they've finally gotten more "new fans" to replace those of us they are losing. But as everyone knows, the new fans will be gone on as soon as the next big thing comes along.
Posted by: Another Cheryl | Sep 2, 2005 12:54:07 PM
Keith, true enough on why people tune in in general. I should have rephrased the question - what is there about this year's racing that is causing more people to watch?
Posted by: Mike Daly | Sep 3, 2005 11:38:24 AM
I don't care how bad the coverage gets on NBC/TNT. They will still be better than Fox until Fox gets rid of their 4 buffoons - especially DW, Hammond & McReynolds. I hate watching those guys.
Posted by: Diane | Sep 6, 2005 11:00:52 AM
If something "big" does happen in a race, we can see it ad nauseum on the sports news. I just listen on the radio and do other things around the house and outside. I only watch to see who screws up the anthem each week.
Posted by: Fran | Sep 8, 2005 12:15:17 PM
hey todd,what gives?eli gold was THE BEST!!!his radio descriptions painted a picture.all commentators should use eli for a role model
Posted by: jwalker8 | Sep 8, 2005 5:29:59 PM
Post a comment
Advertisements
Subscribe to this blog's feed