« "Tom Higgins' Scuffs" - When Watkins Glen comes up, the memories do, too | Main | Tom Higgins: Busch's move is big, but there have been bigger ones »
August 10, 2005
Trouble in paradise for Roush juggernaut
David Green weighs in on the Kurt Busch move that made headlines on Tuesday.
By DAVID GREEN
Kurt Busch’s jump from Roush Racing to Roger Penske’s organization sure came as a jolt, but it is hardly the first chink in the armor for the powerhouse Roush team.
The team went into this year with the impending retirement of rock-solid Mark Martin, who had performed well enough in the first Chase for the Cup that he could legitimately hope for a chance to go out as a champion in 2005. But the Roush signed Jamie McMurray, who still had another season remaining on his contract with Chip Ganassi, to replace Martin.
When it began to appear that Ganassi would hold McMurray to the terms of his pact, Roush asked Martin to consider racing one more year. It’s safe to assume that was not something Martin was happy to hear.
The choice of a replacement for Martin also miffed Roush driver Matt Kenseth, who felt he should have been consulted in the selection of a new driver. If it had been Kenseth who jumped ship, that would have been much less of a shocker.
While all this was going on, the Roush team – which, need I remind anyone, has owned the Cup Series championship for two seasons running – was winning nearly half the first 20 races of the season. Busch’s win at Pocono was his second, and the Roush team’s ninth, of the year.
Unless his career decision causes upheaval within the 97 team, Busch has to be considered a solid bet to score a repeat Cup championship. The question is, how will he perform in a lame-duck status? And how long will he be in that position?
Team chemistry is not necessarily dependent upon harmonious relations, as the “Gas House Gang” St. Louis Cardinals of the 1930s proved. But common sense tells you that it’s not an optimum situation when your driver is already headed toward what he perceives to be greener pastures.
Then, there is the bizarre situation for both McMurray and Busch in 2006. Martin has said he may delay his retirement another year, but Wallace unequivocally will not.
This kind of deal is hardly unprecedented. The first high-profile example in NASCAR’s Modern Era was when Darrell Waltrip bought out his contract with DiGard Racing to move to Junior Johnson’s team in 1981.
It’s also pretty standard stuff in the motorsports world at large. Witness Formula One’s Jenson Button, who last year tried to leave BAR Honda for a ride with the Williams BMW team, but was ordered to honor his contract with BAR; now, Button wishes to remain with BAR in 2006, but may be held to the contract he signed with Williams.
From Darrell Waltrip to Kurt Busch, there’s no question drivers have the right to make the career decisions they think are in their best interests. Each of us would want the same kind of freedom. The bottom line, though, is that all the cutthroat machinations may not settle so well with Joe Racefan, who may rightfully feel that drivers ought to have some loyalty to the teams with which they have enjoyed success.
August 10, 2005 in Racing | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bce769e200d83452092653ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Trouble in paradise for Roush juggernaut:
Comments
I was wondering how long you could have 5 "Stars" on one team without ruffling some feathers. More than one Rooster to a Henhouse seldom works and here he has 5...All of them "Roosters" at the top of their game (ok 1 rooster wants to stop crowing at sunrise and sleep in once in a bit)and they have the egos, and talent and they want the pay and the glory comensurate to their position. But maybe it might have been a bit more tactful to say, "Hey I'm outta here" after the season. Because you are a Lame Rooster and I certainly wouldn't waste my funds to pump your resume for the new guys. Maybe they'll drop both the 42 and the 97's option year (I'm sure money will change hands) and get the malcontent outta the garage.
Posted by: Keith | Aug 10, 2005 10:44:00 AM
Boy, this is going to be one interesting silly season! It appears Kurt may have been talking with Penske and at least one other team (DEI?). Rousch or G. Smith sure opened a huge can worms! It will inetesting for sure. Not sure Felix's comments were very classy. Stay tuned!
Posted by: Kent | Aug 10, 2005 11:01:05 AM
David, don't you suspect that NASCAR will soon make contract-tampering an "action detrimental to stock car racing"? If free agency (a la T.O.) comes to NASCAR, the risk of alienating a big section of the fan base--not to mention the loyal sponsors--is very very real. And that affects the cash registers, which should make the Daytona Mafia take notice.
Posted by: Jo | Aug 10, 2005 1:02:29 PM
I've been a Busch fan through out all his problems but no longer. I always thought some of the dumb things he did were because of immaturity. Now I know they were caused by his stupidity. This situation was undoubtely a payback by Dodge for McMurray thru the gypsy Penske and Busch assisted by stabbing Jack Roush in the back, the man who put Busch where he is instead of stocking shelves or whatever he was doing. Dodge didn't mind causing disruption when it bought teams to return racing. The frustration must be getting unbearable spending all that money and still not able to buy a cup. I guess buying the competitions drivers is next.
Posted by: John | Aug 10, 2005 1:58:41 PM
But John didn't Roush do it first?
And JO I think you're right there might be some Nascar contract involvement. Maybe, like in the NFL where even an agent can't talk to another team w/o permission for a guy under contract. But remember teams are independent contractors Nascar has only so much say unless they want to take on more responsibilty. And why the hell didn't my guidance counselor mention "Sports Law" or "Sports Agent" the Bastard!
Posted by: Keith | Aug 10, 2005 2:30:16 PM
I'll have to respectfully disagree with Busch being stupid. This is about one thing, CASH! It's a dangerous sport and Kurt had been under one of Rouch's long term contracts that was probably significantly undervalued for a cup champ. But I will agree it was a chance for Dodge to exact a little revenge on Ford and Rousch. Do I blame Kurt, no. Will NASCAR step in, probably because they control almost EVERYTHING!
Posted by: Kent | Aug 10, 2005 2:48:39 PM
john,
your comments are rediculous. from what i understand penske had been looking at mcmurray for some time (i know he was wallace's first choice) but when your boy Jack decided to forego the normal rule of waiting for contracts to end and signed mcmurray while he was under contract then everyone was fair game. I personally think its funny that Jack had the table turned on him. if he hadnt signed mcmurray while he was under contract then none of this would have taken place. like the saying goes... you reap what you sew. and i loved felix's comments regarding Jack. honestly i dont think this will be the last Jack driver to leave. he stirred up a hornets nest and now he's gotten stung. i bet ganassi is laughing his ass off right now too!
Posted by: misterschmo | Aug 10, 2005 4:30:51 PM
Keith: For awhile there, the Roush team did far and away the best job ever with top-to-bottom quality for a team larger than two cars. Guess that was too good to last.
Kent: Felix is not exactly known for his restraint. I agree that in saying what he said, he certainly left the high road open for somebody else to use.
Jo: I'm not lawyer, but I'm not sure how much control NASCAR will be able to exercise over this sort of thing. I bet there will be some behind-the-scenes arm-twisting, though.
John, Keith, Kent, Misterschmo: I don't know if I question Busch's intelligence in this matter; Penske may not have won a Cup championship yet, but that's hardly a second-class outfit.
Face it, guys; it's a big and nasty business.
Posted by: David Green | Aug 10, 2005 8:26:06 PM
Just a gentel reminder for those that feel the need to bash Roush.
This week's race at Watkins Glen is the one-year anniversary of Richard Childress hiring Jeff Burton from Roush Racing. Jack released Burton out of his still valid contract.
Goodness of his heart? Maybe, but I tend to think he's smart enough to think a lame duck driver hurts the team and the sponsors who tailor ad campaigns years in advance.
Look for both McMurray and Busch to be in their new rides in '06.
Posted by: Marc | Aug 10, 2005 8:51:38 PM
Who really cares? I personally can't stand Kurt Busch, but I do think it's funny that he will be sponsered by Miller Lite when his last name is the competitor's name!
Posted by: Marty | Aug 11, 2005 4:10:59 AM
I agree Marty. I am no fan of ears either. I hope he gets a pre-nup with his soon to be new wife. No, I really don't it was just a thought.
Posted by: Kim | Aug 11, 2005 7:02:22 AM
Chip Ganassi is just being a jerk in holding McMurray to his contract in 2006. Why would anyone want a lame duck driven for a full season. Jaime doesn't want to race for Ganassi, so let him go and let go of your ego. Maybe you should go back to Indy racing where you were a winner.
Jack Rousch's ego is hurt but I bet he will let Kurt Busch out of his 2006 contract.
Posted by: Steve Engel | Aug 12, 2005 9:33:45 AM
One minor difference, an it is minor, is that Busch is under contract for 2006 while MacMurray was on an 'option' year. Ganassi choose to exercise the option even though Jamie wanted to leave.
I do agree that loyalty has left the building...
Posted by: JPav | Aug 12, 2005 9:46:15 AM
Looks like "That's Racin'" needs another definition: 4. When a mid-20's kid ya plucked from obscurity in a Gong Show and invested millions in takes his trophy-winning butt down the road and signs with a competitor, then asks out of his last year of a "contract," oh well, That's Racin' .
Posted by: Dick Dowling | Aug 12, 2005 11:37:06 AM
how can you say that chip ganassi is being a jerk. first if you havent found out yey let me tell you that ganassi is fieding a 4th team. because of this he is going to need a 4th driver (reed sorenson is taking over the 41 and mears is moving to the new ganassi car)so it makes sense as to why he renewed mcmurrays option. second, while i agree that he should let him out of his contract (not because of a lame duck.. this is a rediculous arguement because no driver goes out there not trying to win and no owner wants to field a losing car regardless) if he chooses to keep mcmurray that is his right to be just as much a dick about it as mcmurray and roush were when they signed knowing he was under contract through 2007. from what ive read penske was looking heavily at mcmurray and the only reason they didnt go after him was because he was under contract and they didnt think it was fair. but once roush stole him from under penskes nose then penske felt they had no other choice but to get a top driver or else face another team doing the same. bottom line... roush f****d up when he signed mcmurray and ithas now cost him much more than he ever dreamed. it has started a whole new trend in nascar and while i dont think it is good for the sport i do get a hell of a good laugh out of seeing Jack Roush with egg all over his face!
Posted by: misterschmo | Aug 12, 2005 12:16:39 PM
well said misterschmo
Posted by: 48fan | Aug 12, 2005 4:55:03 PM
I hate to see Kurt Busch leave Rousch, however Money is A strong persuasion. I wonder if thier is A little greed thier also. It's not like He was in the middle class, as for as money goes. He has made several million with Rousch. As for Jeff Burton he was not doing much any way, nor has he done anything sence. Is it him or the cars he gets? It does make me sad to see Kurt go.
Posted by: Tengallon Hat | Aug 12, 2005 7:14:27 PM
Does anyone think that Michael Waltrip will benefit from all the switching around? Could he be elsewhere by the end of '05?
Posted by: Shelly | Aug 12, 2005 11:01:23 PM
Waltrip's pending departure from DEI, announced last month, was the first confirmed movement of this year's edition of Silly Season, so I'm sure what Shelly means is, will he end up in one of the vacancies that will exist because of the uncertain status of McMurray and Busch in 2006?
Quite possibly, I would imagine, but then again maybe not.
Mikey probably has the highest profile of any four-race winner in NASCAR history, and certainly he's the best in the business in the representing-your-sponsor department. He almost used up all his chances as a driver, though, before the late Dale Earnhardt hired him.
For much of his career, Waltrip seems to have been highly regarded by car owners and other insiders, and there was plenty of evidence for that regard. During his long (15-plus year, 462 races -- remember?) tenure without a victory, Waltrip had plenty of "almost" episodes and, from my recollections, he was never guilty of just brainlessly or carelessly knocking himself out of a victory.
In his time at DEI, yes, the four victories have all come in plate races. But Waltrip has continued to show the potential to win at various other tracks, just as he did during the time prior to Daytona 2001.
Posted by: David Green | Aug 13, 2005 9:40:33 AM
NO NOT DEI.penske is the man he wants to drive for
Posted by: sharon | Aug 17, 2005 9:32:08 PM
Post a comment
Advertisements
Subscribe to this blog's feed