« Aye, Jimmy, we hardly knew ye - Now, meet David Green | Main | Self-improvement made easy: Read "Tom Higgins' Scuffs" »
August 03, 2005
You, too, can get an employee discount - and more from David Green
We're like one of the big automakers. We didn't think of it first, but that's not going to stop us from offering an employee discount to all ThatsRacin.com readers.
That's right: You pay what we pay for clicks on this web site. But we're not limiting it to any specific time period. Our offer is good from now on, so click yourself crazy.
I wonder how that's working for the automakers. Is anyone buying it, or the cars?
Seems to me there's a downside. If you worked at an auto plant for 30 or so years, bought the company's cars for all that time - for you, the kids and even a cousin or two - how does the new sales policy make you feel?
You probably felt a little special for a long time, getting a break the general public never got. But now? Maybe not so much.
Maybe it's not unlike being one of three or more siblings. Mom told you that you were special and it made you feel real good. Then you overheard her telling one of your brothers or sisters the same thing. Maybe not so much any more.
But enough of that.
We're still waiting for the boys back at the shop to get David Green's blog running good, so he's going to run a few more laps in mine today. Good reading.
Indy a special place, and Brickyard a special race
By David Green
The 16-week, 16-race thrash to the finish of the 2005 season begins this weekend at Indianapolis. That's a good place for NASCAR drivers to launch such a high-profile, high-stakes blitz.
The notion of stock cars racing at Indy has always had its share of controversy. First there was the dismay of open-wheel hardliners when the race was first announced. Then there were arguments, many of them from the NASCAR fan base, over whether the track was suitable for stock cars. And many have complained there's no good vantage point from which to view a race at IMS, with all the towering grandstands and structures in the infield.
Lately, there has been some wailing and gnashing of teeth about the "sellout" that resulted in a name change, from Brickyard 400 to Allstate 400 at the Brickyard.
Democratic legislators will endorse Bush administration judicial nominees before those arguments are all settled. But it says here that:
All that aside, there's just no denying the special nature of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. Its iconic status in American and international automobile racing is unparalleled. If you have any knowledge of racing heritage and history, you can feel it when you enter Indianapolis. Ditto Daytona and Darlington and Le Mans. They are like Yankee Stadium or Churchill Downs or the Rose Bowl.
Longevity is a part of it, but there are older tracks. Auto racing was first held at the Nashville (Tenn.) Fairgrounds in 1903, on the site of the present .596-mile oval. The Milwaukee Mile has been in operation since 1904. And, unless my memory is flawed (quite likely), Winchester (Ind.) Speedway began operation as a dirt track in the early 1900s.
Indy opened in 1909 and the first 500-Mile Race was staged in 1911. Until World War II, there was no such thing as "Indy car racing" or "stock car racing." There was just "automobile racing." The cars that raced at local bullrings, one-mile fairgrounds tracks and on the bricks at Indianapolis were very much what NASCAR is now - they grew from production-model autos that were raced to purpose-built racing cars that more or less resembled the passenger cars of the time.
Think about it - take the fenders off your Model T roadster, and it looked for all the world like the machine Pete DePaolo drove to victory at Indy in 1925. The similarities were greater than those between your 2005 Monte Carlo and the one Jeff Gordon drives. DePaolo's racecar even carried a passenger - a riding mechanic.
Indianapolis can't take credit for the counterclockwise direction of most American racing. That belongs to the Kentucky Derby. But many, many other fundamental, underlying strains of Indy 500 DNA can be found in NASCAR and all other U.S. auto racing.
The notion of an oval track such as Bristol having four turns stems from the rectangular Indianapolis Motor Speedway, which truly does have four 90-degree turns. The "most famous four words in motorsports" were first uttered by IMS savior Tony Hulman. The 500-mile distance was an IMS innovation, and because of it, the first major stock car races - in 1950, at Darlington, and 1959, at Daytona - had "500" in their names.
IMS is no less appropriate for stock cars than it is for today's sleek open-wheel cars. The Indy cars and their drivers have adapted. That's part of the appeal. It's why NASCAR should still be racing at Darlington on Labor Day.
Some years, the Indy 500 is truly a great spectacle. Others, it's not so great. The same can be said of any automobile race, including past NASCAR events at IMS.
But the mystique of racing at such a historic place is inescapable.
That's not to say everybody has to pencil in Indy as his or her favorite venue. For those who don't like IMS or the Brickyard 400 by any name, hey - your call.
It's all a state of mind. Mine is that Sunday's Allstate 400 is going to be a really big deal. I was there for the first Brickyard in 400, and it was magical. This one promises to be perhaps the best one yet, if for no other reasons than the story lines.
Will Tony Stewart get a breakthrough victory at the track he cherishes most? Will the Roush team's monster season give them their first win at Indy? Will Jeff Gordon snap out of his career-worst slump and become the first five-time winner in the nearly century-long history of the Speedway?
(And if he does, how will Hoosiers react, given that Jeff seems to be downplaying his Pittsboro, Ind., connection. He was a local fave when he won the inaugural Brickyard in 1994, but nowadays his bio cites his birthplace, Vallejo, Calif. But that's getting off the subject.)
However it may turn out - sizzler or snoozer - I don't intend to miss it.
August 3, 2005 in Racing | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bce769e200d8345130bb53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference You, too, can get an employee discount - and more from David Green:
Comments
The Orlando Sentinel's Ed Hinton weighs in on this and related subjects in a column published today on TR.com, and quotes Tony Stewart as being "furious" about the name change.
All due respect to Ed and Smoke, but I have to agree with MBVoelker on this -- what difference does it all make, anyway?
As for comparisons to other sports that are more dignified or less crass than auto racing, I suggest fans who are offended by such overt, ham-handed commercialism switch to watching those sports. However, they'll want to avert their eyes from all the billboard signage and wear ear protection to avoid being bombarded by public-address announcements trying -- you guessed it -- to sell them something.
Also -- I caution them NOT to try to produce and sell any merchandise with something like "Dallas Cowboys" or "Detroit Red Wings" or "St. Louis Cardinals" logos or emblems. Those are trademarks of commercial enterprises, you know. They're sort of like NASCAR event sponsors.
Perhaps newspapers ought to refer to "the professional baseball team from St. Louis" to avoid being shameless shills for those money-hungry Cardinals owners.
Oh, yeah -- that's gonna happen; probably about the same time Tony Stewart refuses to accept the trophy for winning the Allstate 400 at the Brickyard.
Posted by: David Green | Aug 4, 2005 7:30:48 PM
What does the official name attatched to a race matter? The majority of fans will refer to specific races by the track name (or track location), and the season anyway. We say "Spring Bristol and fall Bristol, June Pocono and July Pocono". If there is only one race per year we call it "Darlington" or "Indy/Brickyard."
I have never heard a Nascar fan use the official race names in casual conversation with the exception only of "Daytona 500".
So why waste all this agony over something that's meaningless in ordinary usage anyway?
Posted by: MBVoelker | Aug 4, 2005 9:00:56 AM
I remember when lots of events had names that, whether you considered them "classy" or "classic" or not, certainly were not "commercial" -- the Old Dominion 500, Gwyn Staley Memorial 400, World 600, American 500, Peach Blossom 500...and let's not forget, please, the Southern 500.
Times change. It wasn't commercialism, but rather political correctness, that led to the demise of NASCAR's original 500-mile race.
Like Don Barzini said in "The Godfather," in the boardroom meeting with the other Mafia leaders, "...after all, we are not communists."
Indeed, we are not. Few of us are as successful at capitalism as the France family has been, but I suspect none of us is averse to making a little more money than we presently make.
Posted by: David Green | Aug 3, 2005 11:27:48 PM
I guess I can't feel too traditional when I think of what the Hooters 500 at the Jack Daniels Kentucky Speedway might be like. The problem is that half the fans might not remember the race.
Posted by: Buddynoel | Aug 3, 2005 9:52:43 PM
Nascar won't cut the ticket prices but it does make the Truck and Busch Series more attractive. You get good racing, good seats, and you didn't have to pawn the eldest child to get in. Plus the Roush/Hendrick show is on TV the next day. Remember if you pawn the kid to go to the big show pick him up on the way back. Mom frowns when you bring fewer home than you took.
Posted by: Keith | Aug 3, 2005 8:53:45 PM
Here's a Stone Age idea: When you sign a corporate sponsor for a multiyear, multimillion-dollar contract, cut the ticket prices instead of further fattening the family's fortune.
Can you say "not gonna happen?"
Posted by: Bob Henry | Aug 3, 2005 6:54:12 PM
I'll have to agree with you, the corporate world is taking some of my favorite things out of nascar. But if the sport is to move foward i guess long time fans like myself need to start accepting it. Whether i like it or not. The only shame i see in most of this is some of the long time traditions are being lost. Of course some of it due to the fact we have 19 year old drivers whom do not know the traditions, but that's neither here or there. As for Gordon winning again, well i'll catch it for saying this from some, but i hope he hits the wall and cries all the way back to the garage. Go Rusty! Either way i'll be listening to the race while on the road yelling at the officials and drivers through the radio.
Posted by: lyn | Aug 3, 2005 6:21:53 PM
Here's a better idea - stick with generic, non-sponsor names for races and racetracks.
Posted by: Mike Daly | Aug 3, 2005 6:16:44 PM
Why don't we take a hint from Major League Baseball. The winning race team will get the chance to name the next year's race. I personally would enjoy seeing the Viagra 400 from Indy. Or for those races that already sold the naming rights, race to name the track. I can image the Dupont Speedway in Kansas City being a permanent item.
Posted by: buddynoel | Aug 3, 2005 5:04:44 PM
Post a comment
Advertisements
Subscribe to this blog's feed