« Kyle Busch gives Toyota it's first win in the Cup Series | Main | Rain seems to be following NASCAR »
March 13, 2008
If Goodyear was pleased with the results after the Atlanta race, then why change the tire for Texas?
Goodyear said all along after the race that they were "pleased" with the performance of the tires at Atlanta, even with all the drivers complaints. If they are so "pleased" and NASCAR is so "pleased" why are they changing their mind about bringing the same tires to the Texas race? Instead of using the Atlanta tires, as of now, teams will be using the same tire codes they used in last years race.
Mike Helton was on Stewart's radio show and basically defended NASCAR and Goodyear, saying Stewart's comments were too harsh. Yes, Stewart was vocal about it, the most vocal about it, but other drivers agreed with Stewart, some spoke up and some didn't. Oh and Goodyear declined to go on the show after numerous invitations.
In his interview, Helton said the tires performed well at a safety standpoint and they didn't have any tire blowouts that caused cautions. Well, he's right on that, there weren't blowout that caused cautions, but the tires did contribute to the cautions that were called. I heard driver after driver complain about no grip, that they were sliding all over the place, feeling like they were going to wreck at any time. That's good? I don't think so.
Now, I'm not an Elliott Sadler fan, but do you think his THREE spins didn't have anything to do with the tires and sliding all over the place? The tires were definitely an issue here. Then you have Greg Biffle, everyone knows he can drive a loose car, one that slides all over the place, he had problems and complained about it too.
But, Goodyear and NASCAR were happy with the results, even though the drivers weren't. If that's the case, why did Goodyear change their minds about bring the Atlanta tire to Texas? If they performed so well and the drivers didn't know what they were talking about, why change the tire? It's easy, they know the drivers are right, they just don't want to admit it.
Is Stewart overreacting? I don't think so, if it was just him saying all this stuff, then maybe, but with others agreeing with him that would say to me that he is just voicing his opinion about something that is a problem. I still like the one quote he said on his radio show...
"You can understand from [NASCAR's] standpoint, listening to Mike, what their objective is and what they feel like Goodyear's objective is but I think they would feel totally different about it if we made every one of the high-ranking NASCAR officials ride in the right seat this past Sunday and feel what we felt. I think they might have a little different opinion about it."
Could you see Stewart taking Helton for a ride at the speeds they race at, not caution speed and still have Helton say they are "satisfied" with the tires? I think Helton's opinion might be a little different then.
Your thoughts?
March 13, 2008 in NASCAR | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bce769e200e5510a5a808833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference If Goodyear was pleased with the results after the Atlanta race, then why change the tire for Texas?:
Comments
My gauge so to speak for just how bad the tires were was Greg Biffle. Everyone knows Biffle can drive sideways like a crab. And when HE complained, I KNEW the tires sucked. As far as the other guys remarking that Stewart "overreacted" well, at least he's not sucking NASCAR's bung hole, putting his head in the sand, and pretending like all is great with the rubber Goodyear provided. IMHO. They all know the tires stunk. The RACE WINNER acknowledged that there were tire issues. Some just choose to kiss the ass of CASHCAR so as not to step on toes.
AND.....by them changing the tire for Texas, they pretty much acknowledge w/o admitting it openly, that they are aware that the tire they provided was unacceptable for the Cup race at AMS>
Posted by: Gretchen | Mar 13, 2008 10:46:15 AM
This is totally a guess here,but I think while GOODYEAR does work hard to deliver a good product,it probably fell behind in the technology needed for the C.O.T....
The new car brings new stats,info,and new problems as well.
In my opinion,GOODYEAR has been so cozy for so long with that fat sponsorship in NASCAR that they didn't advance as quickly as thay should have...how else do you explain these problems?
Kinds reminds me of HENDRICK kickin everybodys ass last year,no excuses,the rest of the teams fell behind in their homework...p.s. "HENDRICKS SUCKS BUT JUNIOR RULZ"!
Posted by: earnhardt nation | Mar 13, 2008 11:12:58 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.
Advertisements
Subscribe to this blog's feed