« Two Sad Goodbyes... | Main | Once Upon A Time In Darlington... »
All About Old Bristol...
Imagine going to a NASCAR Nextel Cup Series race at Bristol Motor Speedway and the grandstands being only half-filled.
It's difficult to believe that ever happened at the .533-mile track in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Tennessee, where approximately 160,000 fans are expected to jam-pack the place Saturday night for the Sharpie 500.
That's about 16 times as many as attended the Volunteer 500 on July 28, 1963. The turnout was estimated at 20,000, too generous a guess by perhaps 10,000.
I was there that Sunday 44 years ago, along with my father and three friends. Unsolicited, an official of the track then known as Bristol International Raceway had mailed a press credential and four prime tickets for seats near the start/finish line to the small weekly newspaper I was running at the time just across the state line in my tiny hometown, Burnsville, N.C.
Unsolicited complimentary tickets to a Bristol race!?
Again, that's unbelievable for the speedway that claims a waiting list of thousands hoping to secure seats for its two NASCAR big-time shows each season.
Turns out it was the only race ever attended by my dad, M.B. "Pappy" Higgins, a lean, lanky, N.C. Wildlife Commission game warden.
Pap was spooked, and fled the grandstand, when superstar Fireball Roberts hit the wall in turn four on the 312th of 500 laps and flipped end-over-end down the fronstretch almost to the first turn, sustaining a wrenched back.
I left the press box to head Pap off and asked where he was going in such a hurry.
"Tommy," he said, his face pale from fright, "if these fellers are damn fool enough to kill themselves, I ain't damn fool enough to watch them."
Pap, then 61 (he was to live until age 92), went to our car and had a beer or two, and missed seeing Fred Lorenzen motor to a 3-second victory over Richard Petty.
The Bristol speedway's popularity boom started in the 1980s when nighttime racing began under mobile lights and ESPN televised the action (translation: lots of wrecks) to a national audience. More and more grandstands have been added annually, it seems, and now Bristol Motor Speedway ranks among the country's top arenas in seating capacity.
The place is totally
unrecognizable from the facility that opened in 1961.
More favorite Bristol Motor
Speedway memories and thoughts:
--The track’s
then grassy infield was the site of a National Football League exhibition game on
Sept. 2, ’61, matching the Washington Redskins and Philadelphia Eagles.
The Redskins were the darlings of Dixie at the time, but the game drew poorly and afterward the players complained loudly about the playing surface being studded with small rocks.
The Eagles, incidentally, won 17-10 as former Duke star Sonny Jurgensen threw touchdown passes of 10 yards to Tommy McDonald and 34 yards to Pete Retzlaff. Ralph Guglielmi passed 41 yards to Dick James for Washington's only TD.
Jurgensen later starred for the Redskins and after retirement became a member of their radio broacast team.
The NFL never has scheduled another game at a race track, at least that I know of.
--The Bristol speedway has become noted for several things, high among them blistering speed on its 36-degree banking and lots of beating and banging among the competitors, leading to rashes of wrecks.
Three races at the track have produced a whopping 20 caution flags each, most recently in August of 2003.
Thus, it strains credulity to see the record book shows not a single yellow displayed in the Volunteer 500 of 1971. Chargin' Charlie Glotzbach won the event--with relief-driving help from Friday Hassler--in a No. 3 Chevrolet fielded by Junior Johnson. Despite the lack of caution periods, Glotzbach/Hassler lapped the field 3 times, completing all 500 laps to 497 for runnerup Bobby Allison.
Glotzbach credited Johnson's chassis setup for the car's superiority, which enabled him to average 101.075 mph, still a track record after 36 years.
But from zero cautions up to 20?
Trace the difference to the drastic increase in speed at Bristol. Richard Petty won the pole in '71 at Bristol at 104.589 mph. The qualifying record has jumped to 128.709 mph, Ryan Newman's lap when he won the pole in March of 2003.
Newman's clocking was a dazzling 14.908 seconds for the .533-miles.
Such a sizzling pace means that even drivers with great reflexes have little time to react when there's trouble ahead of them, resulting in a lot of badly bent-up cars.
--Prior to one race in the '70s at Bristol the entertainment included a jump by local parachutists.
Track officials had no idea how wildly entertaining the jump was destined to prove.
Despite a relatively strong breeze, the 'chutists decided to leap from their plane anyway, planning to alight on the infield.
However, the wind carried them over the front grandstand and into a mountain ridge about a half-mile away.
Veteran Motor Racing Network anchorman Barney Hall remembers it well.
"There were parachutes hanging from trees all over that ridge," recalls Hall. "It took a local rescue squad most of the rest of the day to get all the jumpers down.
"Thankfully, none of them were seriously hurt."
--Cale Yarborough, driving for Junior Johnson, won the Food City 500 of 1977 at Bristol by a whopping seven laps over second place finisher Dick Brooks.
As Yarborough steadily pulled further and further away from the field, radio anchorman Hal Hamrick of the old Universal Racing Network kept trying harder and harder to inject some excitement into the broadcast. He was talking non-stop.
One of my media pals remarked about that, and I was inspired.
Hamrick's radio booth was separated from my seat in the press box only by a thin pane of glass.
I printed a note in large letters on a sheet of copy paper, pecked on the glass and held the message up for Hamrick to read.
I had written "This race is as exciting as artificial insemination!"
Hamrick became so choked he was unable to speak for several moments, then blurted, "Tom Higgins is trying to break me up...And he's doing a good job of it!"
August 20, 2007 in Racing | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bce769e200e54ee1f6d08834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference All About Old Bristol...:
Comments
Thank you Tom
But is it really true about your Dad? ;-)
Posted by: Diane Sadler | Aug 20, 2007 2:48:51 PM
I have been to five races at Bristol. This
is a favorite track to thousands of fans.
This race track is beautiful and so up to
date on everything. My #1 pick to go to a
race would be "Thunder Valley", (Bristol).
Three years in a row, I got to meet and
talk to Dale Earnhardt Sr. I have been on
Pit Road several times and had the
opportunity to meet lots of the drivers.
I live in Michigan and I will travel every
chance I get to go to the Bristol race.
This is one exciting race track. I hope all
of you, who have never been to Bristol will
will have a chance to attend in the future.
Posted by: Race Fan | Aug 20, 2007 3:09:35 PM
Sorry Race Fan, but you can give me free Bristol tickets and I won't go. The old Bristol was okay because it was asphalt and had some decent racing, but short track racing at the Winston Cup level just doesn't work. It's not an exciting track now, it's just a marketing bowl.
Name five good races - I mean actual races, not incidents or finishes or like that, but actual races involving competitive depth for the entirety of the event - that Bristol had had
Posted by: Mike Daly | Aug 20, 2007 5:35:03 PM
I wish more people thought like Mike Daly, that way I might be able to witness the spectacle that is Bristol. Short track racing is where the action is for me, cars strung out over Mich, Pocono, Louden etc make me sleepy.
Posted by: incognito | Aug 20, 2007 6:23:51 PM
By golly Tom Thanks "Back in the Day", My first recollection of Bristol was long before Dale Jr introduced most to Bud Lindemann, I remember seeing it on "Car and Track" in the early 70's, A few years later I heard of a "Mini-Bristol" in Wisconsin, Slinger Speedway, I raced it ONCE and was happy to put the car on the trailer without the help of a wrecker! I have attended Bristol for years...the Spring Race...not so much, But i'll take the Sharpie 500 any day! in 2003(?) I pitted a USAR Hooters Pro Cup there and it was like be in the Coloseum in Rome...Just awsome!
Incognito, Tickets are always available for the Busch and Truck race...and with a lil looking Cup tickets can be found!
Posted by: Fan #5 | Aug 20, 2007 7:43:30 PM
Fan #5, Car & Track covered five Bristol races that I recall - March 1968, and March 1972-5.
Nice try, incognito. There isn't much competition on the short tracks at the Winston Cup level, and I do remember Tony Stewart and Denny Hamlin actually battling for the lead at Pocono this past season - when was the last time anyone did that at Bristol?
Posted by: Mike Daly | Aug 20, 2007 8:23:01 PM
Mike the appeal of Bristol is the "Intimcy" of the 160,000+ there really is no bad seat in the joint, You can see the all the action, just like your Saturday Night Short Tracks. the 36 degrees of banking, 15 second lap times! Unlike Tracks that if something happens you need Binoculars to see whats going on, Lap times of 48 seconds or better...not real conducive to what i call enjoyable...Quite frankly it hard to judge how fast a car is going say at Lowes, Atlanta, Indy or Daytona, but short tracks it's easy to follow along!
Posted by: Fan #5 | Aug 20, 2007 11:05:53 PM
Mike, don't tell me what I find entertaining. We already know what you think.
Everything is much more intense on a short track, if you are watching the leader only that is your problem.
Posted by: incognito | Aug 21, 2007 3:58:46 AM
I want mike Daly,or anyone else to name ONE race anywhere,that had good competitive depth for the entirety of it.No race can be thrilling for 4+ hours,that's just how it is.and race fans accept that.
Posted by: waynethemainbrain | Aug 21, 2007 2:58:07 PM
wayne -
2006 AUTUMN 500
2006 ALABAMA 500
2006 DAYTONA 500
2005 AUTUMN 500
2004 AUTUMN 500
2004 ALABAMA 500
2003 AUTUMN 500
2003 ALABAMA 500
You're 0-for-7, Dakota.
Posted by: Mike Daly | Aug 21, 2007 3:47:29 PM
Fan #5, intimacy can be a euphemism for lack of elbow room, too.
"You see all of the action." So? It's right there in front of you, there's no spectacle of size involved.
The comparison to Saturday Night tracks ignores that those tracks have much better racing, and have long been hurt by Winston Cup's ridiculous insistence on running Saturday night when it belongs ONLY on Sunday afternoon.
"15-second lap times." Again, so? Speed is not what racing is about. Getting back to local tracks, half-milers usually see 20-second lap times - where is anything lost in the racing because they're five seconds slower than what the Cup guys run?
"36-degrees of banking." For a short track that's preposterous; that level of banking is better suited to superspeedways.
"It's easy to follow." It's too easy to follow; it does not challenge the fan.
Posted by: Mike Daly | Aug 21, 2007 3:51:48 PM
incognito, I'll tell you what you find entertaining because you haven't the credibility to figure it out yourself. How's that sound?
"Everything is much more intense on a short track." No it isn't; it's just more crowded with lapped cars. "If you're watching only the leader that is your problem." No, it is a fundamental flaw in modern racing - the leader almost invariably is not racing anyone. There's no competition worthy of the name when the leader has no challenge.
Posted by: Mike Daly | Aug 21, 2007 3:54:08 PM
Credibility has zero affect on these discussions.
I don't know what Bristol you have seen, but the leader is always racing lapped traffic and rarely more than a couple car lengths ahead of second place in the one I watch.
I think that I am begining to understand that you watch racing for different reasons than I do. While we both hope to derive entertainment from the activity, it's pretty obvious that you focus on nothing more than who is out front at any particular moment. I enjoy watching the whole scene and how things constantly change.
How exactly should a fan be "challenged"? I thought the goal was to entertain them.
Posted by: incognito | Aug 21, 2007 10:53:42 PM
Mike, do you have it in your ability to be just a little more professional in your post? You sound like the kid in school that always knew more than anyone else, had more than anyone else, and was better than anyone else. You come across like a first rate jerk and if you had any sense, you would realize no one here takes anything you say seriously. While you may not think Bristol is racing, by far, the public disagrees with you (go figure). Check attendance at Bristol, check TV ratings at Bristol.....and b4 you come back with any stupid ass stats....I work in marketing and keep up with ratings for a living, so yes I have checked, yes I do have my facts straight. Racing is entertainment...Fans think Bristol is entertaining.....you may not and that is your right, but dont try to convince the world that everyone else is wrong. We are grown up now and realize the kid that thought he was so much smarter and had the most toys, was a joke and in real life was an ignorant wanna be somebody that never had sense enough to succeed.
There....I said it.....due to my job, I cant post my legitimate email.....but I would bet I speak for more than a few people on here.
Posted by: mikedalyhater | Aug 22, 2007 12:23:44 AM
MIKEDALYHATER
Great comments and I agree with you 100%.
It's about time someone socked it to him.
Thanks, Mikedalyhater, for telling it like
it is.
Posted by: Angel | Aug 22, 2007 1:49:50 AM
mikedalyhater
YOUR COMMENTS ARE SO TRUE
Thanks, your comments fits mikedaly just
perfect. He thinks, he is "Mr. Know It All"
when it comes to racing. mikedaly is so
arrogant and obnoxious in his comments.
Hope he reads your comments and takes heed
to them.
Posted by: Race Fan | Aug 22, 2007 2:56:04 AM
Well now folks I hate to be a party pooper, But Mike Daly and I will butt heads and agree to disagree on Nascar racing, HOWEVER he is knowlagable in the history, he's has reminded me of stuff I have long forgot, I just wish he would translate into modern era terms...I haven;t the faintest idea what the "Autumn 500" is...I think he has oldtimers...sorry Mike, He likes Hew Hampshire(cringe) and I like Bristol, But I do appreciate his flavor he adds to these posts
Posted by: Fan #5 | Aug 22, 2007 11:22:31 AM
You saw it different than I did. As I remember, Fireball hit the guardrail 3 or 4 times in the middle of turn 3 and 4. When on the last time he hit it he went up on top of the guardrail. When he came off he rolled 5 times and came to rest on the exit of turn 4. He was coming out of the car before it ever stopped. That was back when racing was racing.
Posted by: Garrett Tweed | Aug 22, 2007 3:04:48 PM
Mike Daly - are you by any chance Monkeesfan on other blogs? Its amazing how people out here will stand there and thump their chests loudly and rudely proclaiming their OPINIONS to be truth. Reality is they are nothing more than OPINIONS. I for one like the Chase, I like short tracks, especially for live viewing versus TV, I hate Pocono Raceway, love the COT, and think NASCAR is well within its rights to stand up to AT&T. Those are called OPINIONS. Here's another OPINION: Bristol is a great place to watch a race, but the racing over the past few years has declined significantly; the condition of the track made it a one groove event which meant for basically boring racing unless cars were hitting each other. Now, with a new surface and based on what I saw Wednesday night in the truck race, it looks as though there are two grooves - which should make for some great racing!
The nice thing about NASCAR racing is the variability of tracks - short, intermediate, superspeedways, road courses... but when you mix it up, you cant please everyone. If you dont like whats on for a race, dont watch - I'm sure theres a lawn that needs mowing somewhere!
Just my OPINION
Posted by: NH_NascarFan | Aug 24, 2007 2:47:31 PM
nascar told a lie on kyle busch and @@@@ him good, nascar is fixed.
Posted by: larry | Aug 24, 2007 9:56:41 PM
NH_NASCARFAN, you hate Pocono Raceway, but can you come up with anything resembling a valid reason? NASCAR is not within its rights to stand up to AT&T because all AT&T is doing is changing a logo while NASCAR is all but extorting sponsors to pay mammoth fees and taking them away from race teams. You can have opinions but back them up with some facts, otherwise there's no validity to them.
What I saw Wednesday and Friday, the new surface didn't do anything for the racing - where was this side by side racing they rave about?
Posted by: Mike Daly | Aug 25, 2007 5:43:01 PM
hater - Brisol attendence isn't different from most superspeedways. TV ratings aren't as good as you think they are. So no, you don't have your facts straight.
Racing is competition - that means LEAD CHANGES. Bristol is not entertaining because it's uncompetitive. If you want to hold an opinion, have facts behind it, otherwise shut your trap.
Posted by: Mike Daly | Aug 25, 2007 5:45:29 PM
incognito, the leader laps cars and never has to fight for that lead. I don't understand what you watch racing for, because racing is about competition and competition means lead changes; you are SUPPOSED to wach the leaders because that's the only legitimate area to watch. The "whole scene" is just that, it's the lead that matters.
"How should a fan be 'challenged?'" By having to make a little effort to see the cars - not an excessive amount like on a road course or at Indianapolis, but some effort. On a short track they're just there in front of you, that's not fun.
Posted by: Mike Daly | Aug 25, 2007 5:49:15 PM
Mike, you state "TV ratings aren't as good as you think they are. So no, you don't have your facts straight." You ignorant, wanna be know it all.....Stats are my job, tv ratings, sponsor ratings, (did you even know sponsors actually rated nascar events???, radio ratings, attendance percentages and sales at tracks. If you have enough intelligence to keep your heart beating, you should know lead changes, number of passes, etc. are not what makes people love specific race venues. If you dont like Bristol, fine, who cares? But for you to state your opinion as facts is absurd. You cannot back up 50% of the trash you talk when you speak of "what people want to see" and while you may know driver stats from way back...thats isnt what makes nascar today. Nascar is all about what people want to spend money to see. And you and your endless spats of self declared intelligence is not it. It amazes us low lifes that Nascar is second only to the NFL in sales, tv ratings, exceeds the NFL in some venues and with all of that, you still think you could run it better....what a total moronic waste of oxygen.
Posted by: mikedalyhater | Aug 25, 2007 6:19:22 PM
hater, stats are not your forte, because you're wrong all around. Facts are facts and the onus is on you to prove your case, something you don't even try to do.
Lead changes are EXACTLY what make people love specific races because that is the only statistic that ultimate means anything.
hater, given that you're in denial about the sport, yes I can run it better.
Posted by: Mike Daly | Aug 25, 2007 8:30:15 PM
Post a comment
Advertisements
Subscribe to this blog's feed