« Run Candyman, run! | Main | Green-white-checker rule is 'yellow' »
July 16, 2006
Clean Air
I usually keep things on the lighter side and definitely on the "pc" side. Billy Venturini always called me, Mr. PC. I also know no one wants to hear the two words at the top of the page but I think that clean air on the front of these race cars is still having a huge impact. I try to think that I am pretty observant when I see what is happening on the track and the issue of clean air has caught my attention for the past couple of weeks. I have not heard many drivers complain about it lately but to me the "clean air" issues are still very important. Maybe everyone is just dealing with it because they no that the "car of tomorrow" is coming soon. The best answer I have is that the teams know the problem will always exist so they are just continuously working to make it better for their car and driver.
There have been some observations that I have made over the last few races. In the Busch race last week at Chicago I noticed that when Mears got out front, his car came to life. I was glad to see him make it to victory lane. His crew made a good call and they made the most of it. I was spotting for David Green and I noticed how hard it was in the "dirty air" or in traffic for him and several others to make passes. A lot of times he could run up to the car in front of him but to get by them he had to hunt some clean air by trying the top of the track or by running the opposite lane of the car in front of him. He had a tough day but they never gave up and raced as hard as they could all day long. Kurt Busch was strong all day in the Busch race as well but I think getting back in traffic hurt the handling of his car. Carl Edwards might have thrown my theory out the window in a few laps because he was able to work the traffic and almost made it back to Mears.
Sunday, during the Cup race at Chicago, dad was a good example of clean air helping a car and dirty air hurting a car. When he was in the back of the pack he could not make much progress but there was a time when he was one of the first laps down cars that was lined up on the inside. On one of the restarts he was able to fall in line around sixth or seventh. He was able to stay there for a while. Again, this is all just my opinion and observations, but I think the clean air on the front of the car helped him be able to stay up there and have a shot at being the "lucky dog." Unfortunately, he lost third gear and was never able to make up a lap.
This Sunday morning, as I sit waiting on race time, the clean air thoughts just keep popping into my mind. Yesterday, in the Busch Series race, I spotted for Green again. He went down a lap early but was in contention to get the "free pass" if the caution would fly at the right time. When he could line up towards the front and fall in line up there he could stay up around the top ten but when he would fall back into traffic the car looked totally different. He had another rough day at Loudon. The car lost power with about 20 laps to go and he lost several spots that he had fought hard all day to keep. To contradict my thinking a little bit, Carl Edwards and Clint Bowyer were able to work traffic, and the clean air issue did not seem to affect them as bad.
I guess I will see if the same issues come into effect today in the Cup race here at Loudon. There will always be teams that can figure out the issues they are dealing with better than others but I still think that clean and dirty air are affecting many cars out there. Something else that helps resolve this issue is how well your team gets you off of pit road. There may be larger issues to worry about but this has been something I have been thinking about for a few weeks and thought I would see what your thoughts were on clean air.
These posts are just my thoughts and opinions. This is the Mr. PC coming out in me!
Call 1-888-GO-RACE-1 or visit www.racingadventure.com for more information on how you can join us and experience the time of your life by driving a race car.
July 16, 2006 | Permalink
Comments
Hey Jason,
Good to hear from a "spotter's" view.
Is clean air an issue at NH? Still find that track very hard to like. Based on the Busch race attendance, I'm not alone. Maybe it was the heat.
Posted by: Larry | Jul 16, 2006 1:57:34 PM
Jason I think you can trace your "PC-ness" to your Dad and Grandfather...what a blessing.
Todays cars are too aero dependant! NASCAR has made a common template and basicaly the only difference is the head and tailight decals and the shape of the quarter window, I'm fairly sure Ned didn't run into an "aero-push" back in the day...what an interview and treat that would be for fans! NASCAR needs to get back roots...and Y'all know what I'm sayin'.
Posted by: Tbfka# 5 | Jul 16, 2006 3:10:48 PM
Jason, hi! This is my first post on one of your blogs, so I'll start off by telling you how jealous I am because of your family tree! I think the greatest moment in NASCAR is when your gramdad stopped to help Fireball Roberts. That was a truly great task, and an example of the values your family has. Congratulations. Now on to racin.
Dirty air clean air, is garbage that NASCAR has brought on itself. If they wouldn't sanction these cookiee cutter tracks we wouldn't care about it, because it would be a non issue. Take the cars back to stock dimensions. If Ford wants to win, make them design a winning car, the COT has great points for driver safety. And that is the most important aspect of racing, but can you not move the drivers seat inward in a fusion, monte, or charger, and still have the same factory dimensions? I love the new dodge hemi, but if it was at factory specs, it would be a brick on the track. In my opinion if you want to call it stock car racing, that is what you have to get back to. Make them stock, make them fit the MFGR templates not nascars generic templates. Bring something back that we had in the past, instead of moving forward and deleting everything we have known in the past...
Posted by: Stidog | Jul 17, 2006 12:14:57 AM
I agree Stidog. The Dodge currently on the track is nothing like the Charger that was in my rear view mirror this morning. If it was at manufacturer's specs, it wouldn't even make the race. NASCAR gave up on "stock cars" a long time ago, which is sad for the true NASCAR fan.
Jason, the only thing I know about "clean air" is what I hear or read. But there is no doubt some cars just could not get anywhere when in traffic. However, Carl Edwards Fusion just seemed to “stick” to the race track. I believe that if Hamlin would have got out of the way, Carl would have chased down Kyle, and the 99 would have been in Victory Lane.
And being Politically Correct is an excellent quality, especially when it's not forced. You and your family will always be considered a class act in my household.
Good luck at Pocono and the rest of the season!
Posted by: Shirley | Jul 17, 2006 8:19:54 AM
Hey Jason, your dad is a moving roadblock. He and Micheal will make a great pair of moving chicanes next year!!
Posted by: Mekklo BRaca | Jul 17, 2006 2:31:43 PM
Jason: Are you giving up on racing cars yourself? I thought you would be working your way up to Nexel Cup. Just wondering.
Posted by: Charles Kemp | Jul 17, 2006 2:45:26 PM
Larry,
I'm with you Loudon could go completely off my schedule and I wouldn't lose any sleep. No wait, if Loudon is off I lose a nap...But not to worry Poconap is the week after!
Posted by: Keith | Jul 17, 2006 4:58:46 PM
Hey,
I like the seriousness and the charcasim that you guys are bringing. There are many ways to look at any issue that racing presents so thanks for sharing your views. There is no mercy when hiding behind these computers! See you next week.
Jason A. Jarrett
Posted by: Jason A. Jarrett | Jul 18, 2006 1:56:41 PM
Hey Mekklo,
What a rude thing to say to Jason about his dad. If you can't say anything nice.....
Posted by: Dot | Jul 18, 2006 4:11:20 PM
Clean air will stay an issue until NASCAR attacks what dirty air is doing - the COT is advertised as doing so by reducing downforce, but reducing downforce never works. Dirty air right now is pushing back trailing cars instead of pulling them forward; attack this angle instead of downforce; make dirty air pull cars forward.
Posted by: Mike Daly | Jul 18, 2006 6:04:31 PM
Actually i believe the COT addresses this issue by making the cars produce more drag, like the cars do at Daytona and Talladega. Which is what Mike is refering to. We dont need Daytona and Talladega type packs at Atlanta and Texas, the best handling car should alwyas be faster. Also that little lip they have at the bottom of the front valence should help plant that nose when behind another car. It remains to be seen.
Posted by: Jack Bauer | Jul 18, 2006 8:21:38 PM
PS: Jason tell your dad he is still a moving chicane and going to MWR(another roadblock who needs to be moved) isnt going to help anything but padd his wallet.
Posted by: Meeklo Braca | Jul 18, 2006 8:22:25 PM
Jack Bauer, the COT doesn't produce that much more drag, and in all the testing to date they haven't handled better in dirty air than present-day cars. "We don't need Daytona/Talladega packs at Atlanta and Texas." Oh yes we do; if you saw the Modifieds at NHIS you'd see how good that kind of racing can be on the flat superspeedways, the intermediate supers, and even the one-milers.
The gapped airdam makes the car push more, and the splitter on the bottom doesn't change that; why they don't run a flush airdam I can't figure out.
Posted by: Mike Daly | Jul 19, 2006 12:59:43 AM
Why would we want huge packs at every track? So we can pile up 30 cars every race? Its bad enough we run 2 of them.
Posted by: Jack Bauer | Jul 19, 2006 3:36:43 AM
Jack Bauer, because more cars fighting for the win means more competition.
Posted by: Mike Daly | Jul 19, 2006 2:10:49 PM
MIKE DALY
YOU NEED TO AKE A GOOD SHUT UP!!!!
NOBODY WANTS TO READ YOUR MR KNOW IT ALL COMMENTS, YOU ARE ALWAYS RUNNING SOMEBODY DOWN.
Posted by: MAGOO | Jul 26, 2006 8:39:52 PM
Post a comment
Advertisements
Subscribe to this blog's feed