« So much for seniority! Has NASCAR peaked? | Main | ESPN has many options for viewers – Does NASCAR care? »
September 02, 2006
Anger management
By DAVID GREEN
After reading the headline, many of you probably imagined this was going to be about Tony Stewart, or perhaps Carl Edwards, and some of the on- and off-track antics that have punctuated recent racing events. Come on, admit it; you did, didn't you?
But, no -- this is not about that. Instead, let's talk about all the ways in which our culture promotes the expression of anger, and then prescribes treatment for the malady. We'll focus our discussion on the effect of the mass media on these things.
We'll quickly dispense with the print media, as access to newspapers and magazines is so limited nowadays in comparison to electronic forms. In old times and in new, the bully pulpits of the print media are occupied only by the few, the proud, the (usually) arrogant. Letters to the editor never get Page 1 display or 72-point headlines.
Let's start with the Internet and blogs such as this one. For every good, thought-provoking, respectful debate, there are probably a dozen or more spewings of hatred, laced with the worst kind of profanity and vulgarity.
But still, widespread as it has become, the Internet stills serves a smaller audience than television, so let's skip ahead to TV.
Many of the TV characters we watch are just as proud and (usually) arrogant as their ink-stained counterparts, and they have an even tighter grip on the limited number of venues. That's why they are pop-culture "stars" of varying magnitudes; compared to the great unwashed masses that make up their audiences, there are so precious few of them.
Accessibility to their world is available in very limited quantities. For race fans, the best example of this is the call-in program. The one with the widest spectrum and, most likely, the largest audience is Speed's "Wind Tunnel with Dave DeSpain."
DeSpain seems to be a polarizing character whom most fans love or loath. I find his commentary almost always reasoned and fair, even on the handful of occasions when my opinion happens to differ with his. He usually treats callers with, I think, an appropriate level of respect relative to their own attitudes. It's easy to make fun of hillbillies (just look at the success of Jeff Foxworthy and the Blue Collar Comedy franchise), ands sometimes the erudite Dave cannot resist a little condescending fun at some caller's expense.
One thing that does come through in DeSpain's show is his passion for motor sports and his knowledge of it. It is quite easy for passion to move up a notch into -- you guessed it -- anger. The producers of "Wind Tunnel" are not only aware of this; they are exploiting it via their "Fired Up!" segment of the show.
"We're looking for angry fans," proclaims the Speed Web site. "What did you see this weekend that has you fuming? Whatever it is, we want to hear about it!"
Just call "Fired Up," and rant away, angry fan!
Then there's the new replacement program for the old "Speed News." "The Speed Report" gives us more flash and dash, a whiz-bang set reminiscent of ESPN's iconic SportsCenter. Gone are the likes of Bob Varsha, Connie LeGrand, Ralph Sheheen and others; instead, we have the young and hip Drew and Nicole.
And, lo and behold, there's a segment titled "The Angry Minute." It's not a venue for fans to spout, but rather something that's more likely to incite them. It features things such as the near-violent encounter between Danny Lasoski and his father in the pits at the Knoxville Nationals after an on-track tangle between Lasoski and his nephew, Brian Brown. Brown was driving a car prepared by George Lasoski, Danny's father and Brian's grandfather.
A therapist probably helped write the disclaimers. "Before you shoot the TV or kick the dog...give us a call at 1-866-WTUNNEL and vent with a vengeance," reads the Web promotion for "Fired Up!"
But is there any merit to that notion? Does venting into your telephone for "Fired Up" or watching a Lasoski family feud or the latest Paul Tracy fisticuffs on "The Angry Minute" really make anyone less angry? Or, perhaps, does it merely stir the pot a little more?
Something tells me the producers of such programming don't lose any sleep worrying about such distinctions. As long as those numbers stay up there, baby...
September 2, 2006 | Permalink
Comments
I think David's got some great points here. If I had any reservations, though, they'd involve his treatment of Internet sites like ours at ThatsRacin.com. He's letting us off pretty lightly, I think.
Sure, TV's the big player on this block, but interactivity is a big part of our business here, too. Some readers - or "users" in the parlance - seem to like having their say. I dunno, maybe some people feel that they've been talked "down to" by the media for generations and are finally getting their chance to fire back.
Make no mistake, we encourage that interactivity here, too. But none of that changes, or even challenges, the validity of David's points.
Thanks for reading. And interacting.
Posted by: Bob Henry | Sep 2, 2006 12:58:33 PM
David,
I don't think you're giving the internet enough credit here. While TV may have a bigger audience, it's limited in that usually for 1 input you get 1 point of view. The internet allows you to search for more input and get a rounder view of an issue. You can search for facts in favor of or against an issue...TV sends what they want you to see. I think with the internet we've come full circle back to the soapbox in the town square. Blogs, Youtube, Myspace, etc are the soapboxes of today and I think it's good that people feel they can be heard.
I think I balance on DeSpain. Knowledge on one hand and arrogance on the other balances out at about 50/50. I don't seek him out on TV but if I hit the channel and he's on I might watch.
So, for anger management...
Paper media: Provides the least relief because there is no guarantee anyone will ever read it and response to it (if any) is slow and limited by the circulation.
TV media: Maybe more relief than paper because you know you were heard, but the feedback response is limited by the TV show.
Internet media: Provides the greatest relief. You can reach and/or seek out people of like or unlike opinions; Receive instant feedback (sometimes not always polite like you mentioned); The communication is two way as opposed to the basically one way communication of TV and published media...Communication is the best way to resolve issues and relieve stress.
Posted by: Keith | Sep 2, 2006 1:18:55 PM
I think the three of you have made your point. You may have read one or more of my previous comments to some people. About the only thing that makes me hit the little red X at top right is when a conversation turns to the HATE comments. I love to debate ideas and i'm usually just as stubborn as the next guy in not wanting to admit i was (partialy) wrong. The one thing that realy turns me off are the HATE comments. How ever I do like it when some ones spelling is worse than mine.
Posted by: 328 | Sep 2, 2006 5:25:16 PM
Re
Re: dave. I do like his show "wind tunnel" and I think he is colourful but I wish they had left Allen Bestwick on the other show. Any of you people got connections to find out why Allen was demoted.
Posted by: 328 | Sep 2, 2006 5:27:55 PM
I agree with many of the points that have been made here. This forum gives everyone a chance to respond with their opinion,fact, or story. What is disconcerting, however, is the level of vituperation that can be escalated to with two or three exchanges. Come on folks, this is racing, a sport, entertainment. It should be fun for participants to issue their hindsights, opinions and back their favorites. It should not devolve to name calling or acid remarks about the drivers, their teams and their owners. It seems that the anonimity afforded by this medium goads responders to higher levels of acrimony. I hope that they do not conduct their daily lives in this manner. Some of us need to get over ourselves and get a life.
Posted by: Barely | Sep 2, 2006 7:02:54 PM
Dave has a passion for racing.It shows in his interveiws and his comments.He is a little biased to motorcycles and it shows but he has knowledge of all forms of racing and can discuss anything involved in racing.His show is one of the top shows on TV I watch.
My passion for racing grew from my families outings to our local track at home.Sitting on the hill,overlooking the grandstands and watching the "old coupes"race on dirt.
The Paper media has not done justice to racing as most stories,by the time printed are out of date and or not even factual anymore.
The passion of racing comes thru the writings of people like David Green,Bob Henry,Shirley Buttacavoli ,Mark Young,Bud(#5),David Poole,Tom Higgins,Carol Einarsson ,or Keith Ott.and lastly Diane
thats what I like to read .
Posted by: trucker | Sep 2, 2006 7:08:18 PM
Some fans put the "Fan" in Fanatic...I put the "Fun" in funeral!;)
Posted by: Tbfka#5 | Sep 2, 2006 8:10:33 PM
Barely: "What is disconcerting, however, is the level of vituperation that can be escalated to with two or three exchanges."
Certainly that is a concern and I have noted some of the disgraceful conduct on certain writers posts here, it's even more troubling the sorry excuses some use for the behaviour.
"well he started it," is common as is "remember it's a 'Fan Site'" as if that somehow dismisses all obligation to civility.
It's all third grade playground stuff and should be moderated. Sadly it hardly ever is here.
Posted by: Marc | Sep 2, 2006 9:29:10 PM
Marc,
As a poster on TR, and I'm sure David Green is of a similar mind, my thoughts are that people seldom read overly perverse or derogatory posts...they pass them by. A polite post, either for or against a topic gets read and thought about. Thats just my opinion.
Actually there isn't much we haven't seen posted but we are here for you. Again JMO
Posted by: Keith | Sep 2, 2006 11:39:03 PM
#5,
Off the meds again, are we?...LOL
Posted by: Keith | Sep 3, 2006 12:59:27 AM
Wow. What great responses. A hearty thanks to all.
I focused on the so-called professional media and skipped over the Internet because my expectations of the professionals (their performances over the past decade or so notwithstanding) are a little higher. It's one thing when an Internet blogger, for example, conducts a poll on "the driver you hate the most," but something else altogether when a bona fide media outlet stoops to that kind of incendiary tripe.
I see professional Internet sites as extensions of conventional print or broadcast media. The obvious benefit they bring is interactivity. Things such as blogs and personal Web sites do, indeed, provide an opportunity for one to participate in debate, and that does provide a measure of "relief," as Keith put it.
That probably represents an old-school attitude, even though I began working in the Internet medium some 10 years ago. I'm still waiting, I guess, to see how the "citizen journalism" experiment will work out, or if, because of the nature of its participants, it will forever be a work in progress of sorts.
As Marshall McLuhan said, "It’s inevitable that the whirl-pool of electronic information movement will toss us all about like corks on a stormy sea, but if we keep our cool during the descent into the maelstrom, studying the process as it happens... we can get through." ("The Essential McLuhan," Eric McLuhan and Frank Zingrone, Basic Books, 1996)
I'm not sure whether it's the Internet or 21st century television that's more representative of the "maelstrom" McLuhan describes. One thing I am certain of, though, is the maelstrom.
Posted by: David Green | Sep 3, 2006 10:01:03 AM
Well first and foremost. The TV coverage stink's on motorsports. At least"back in the day" when IWC was our only source for truly behind the scenes info. It was good, miss schrader, and although I am not a Mikey fan miss him as well....
TV, it is pathetic. You watch a race and can learn far more from blogs and net sites about the weekend than the newspaper or the damn race coverage.
Coverage on TV is horrendous, we all know that but in turn,sites as thatracin or Jayski can give you more info. I dont prefer the watered down coverage TV offers.
Dillner on Speed worked with me on ARCA as Buddy Baker did, and they really(of anyone else) dont sugarcoat anything.
Webber has his moments, but has lost alot since the ESPN days....
I actually detest this years lineup of race broadcasters(TNT). I wish Benny well and mean nothing obtrusive towards him but get tired of the wrong refs. or wrong car #'s or drivers...
At least the net has provided us all an outlet for our feeling.. Despain, I do like but I wouldnt say is a total Cup fan by any means...
Posted by: Kurt2 | Sep 3, 2006 12:54:53 PM
Hey Guys! I was bored so I to the opportunity to see what Keith's "Win and In" scenario where implemented...
2005-12 winners
2004-12 winners
2003-15 winners
2002-16 winners
2001-13 winners
*these figures could be skewered due to the fact my year old lab chewed my glasses to hell...i think she ate the damn lens!
Posted by: Tbfka#5 | Sep 3, 2006 2:24:14 PM
#5,
While the facts may be skewed, the dog certainly would have been skewered had he chewed on said specticles. Expeditiously skewered. Since I don't own a dog.
Posted by: Keith | Sep 3, 2006 7:45:59 PM
Hey David,
To me, Despain was a relief on INC. He "reels in" the panel before they spool. Before it seemed to me as though the moderator was trying to be a comedian. Mikey already has that role along with Kenny.
My "print" hero is the Daytona NJ. The staff covers racing full throttle. The "Hey" comes from my favorite sportswriter as a tribute.
When the hate blogs, I scroll. Don't get caught up in someone elses accident.
It is a sad commentary on our society when the anger/violent attitude prevails.
Posted by: Larry | Sep 3, 2006 9:46:53 PM
Chief Keith:
"Marc, my thoughts are that people seldom read overly perverse or derogatory posts...they pass them by."
I beg to differ, strenuously.
It's not just an isolated individual, in many cases threads devolve in long strings of insults thrown about between groups of people as large as 6-8.
And it gets worse if one or two people make an honest attempt to tone down the rhetoric and invective. They then become targets of the rest of the "bomb-throwers."
It's sad and frankly unbecoming considering That's Racin is one of the largest and well read sites on the net.
In some cases it doesn't say much for their standards.
Posted by: Marc | Sep 4, 2006 9:55:02 AM
Hey David part 2,
On TV. The last unevent was the storm Ernesto. Perfect example of the media preying on our fears. The networks were falling over each other trying to sensationalize a rainstorm to "panic in the streets". Our racing example would be the media's attempt at taking a bumpnrun or and accident and making it a fuming rivalry bordering on all out retaliation/war.
The internet seems to bring out the "mob" mentality which everyone gets the luxury of hiding behind the keyboard. We now have a culture of "tattle-terrorist". And piling on that has spewed to road rage and throwing beer on the track, even the basketbrawl.
After sorting thru the bad stuff, I very much enjoy the blog. I got hooked on "Over the Wall". It is fun, if not theraputic reading and sharing with like-minded people.
For some of the posts, I offer an expression from my old hardware days.
Some nuts, no wrench will fit.
Posted by: Larry | Sep 4, 2006 11:02:04 AM
David, excellent points, and I truly hope some folks will read what has been written and remember it when posting comments in the future. (Marc, I couldn’t have said it better myself.)
Re: Dave Despain and Wind Tunnel - that is one of my favorite shows. Sunday night football has to wait until 10 p.m. Dave has said numerous times that he's a "two-wheel guy" and that the "guys in the back" feed him constant information. It's obvious that "team" is on top of their game and I hope no one goes in and screws it up like they have so many other shows on Speed.
I was one of those "Fired Up" callers when commercials were interrupting interviews with drivers AND the first lap of the All Star race. My "voice" didn't make it on the air, but another caller's did and he basically quoted my message. And yes, it did feel good after I vented to Dave's voice mail!
When I get “Fired Up” about the coverage provided for all forms of motor sports, I have to remember it wasn’t that long ago that the only way I could “watch” a race was on Wide World of Sports or sitting on my friend’s porch with the AM radio cranked as loud as we could get it.
We’ve come a long way baby!
With that said, I’d like to send a big “thank you” to Bob Henry for providing the opportunity for all of us to view our opinions. And thanks to David for bringing this subject to our attention.
Very well done gentlemen!
Posted by: Shirley | Sep 5, 2006 9:09:17 AM
one that must drive the France Family CRAZY!
Posted by: Tbfka#5 | Sep 5, 2006 2:45:53 PM
Post a comment
Advertisements
Subscribe to this blog's feed