« So much for seniority! Has NASCAR peaked? | Main | ESPN has many options for viewers – Does NASCAR care? »
September 02, 2006
Anger management
By DAVID GREEN
After reading the headline, many of you probably imagined this was going to be about Tony Stewart, or perhaps Carl Edwards, and some of the on- and off-track antics that have punctuated recent racing events. Come on, admit it; you did, didn't you?
But, no -- this is not about that. Instead, let's talk about all the ways in which our culture promotes the expression of anger, and then prescribes treatment for the malady. We'll focus our discussion on the effect of the mass media on these things.
We'll quickly dispense with the print media, as access to newspapers and magazines is so limited nowadays in comparison to electronic forms. In old times and in new, the bully pulpits of the print media are occupied only by the few, the proud, the (usually) arrogant. Letters to the editor never get Page 1 display or 72-point headlines.
Let's start with the Internet and blogs such as this one. For every good, thought-provoking, respectful debate, there are probably a dozen or more spewings of hatred, laced with the worst kind of profanity and vulgarity.
But still, widespread as it has become, the Internet stills serves a smaller audience than television, so let's skip ahead to TV.
Many of the TV characters we watch are just as proud and (usually) arrogant as their ink-stained counterparts, and they have an even tighter grip on the limited number of venues. That's why they are pop-culture "stars" of varying magnitudes; compared to the great unwashed masses that make up their audiences, there are so precious few of them.
Accessibility to their world is available in very limited quantities. For race fans, the best example of this is the call-in program. The one with the widest spectrum and, most likely, the largest audience is Speed's "Wind Tunnel with Dave DeSpain."
DeSpain seems to be a polarizing character whom most fans love or loath. I find his commentary almost always reasoned and fair, even on the handful of occasions when my opinion happens to differ with his. He usually treats callers with, I think, an appropriate level of respect relative to their own attitudes. It's easy to make fun of hillbillies (just look at the success of Jeff Foxworthy and the Blue Collar Comedy franchise), ands sometimes the erudite Dave cannot resist a little condescending fun at some caller's expense.
One thing that does come through in DeSpain's show is his passion for motor sports and his knowledge of it. It is quite easy for passion to move up a notch into -- you guessed it -- anger. The producers of "Wind Tunnel" are not only aware of this; they are exploiting it via their "Fired Up!" segment of the show.
"We're looking for angry fans," proclaims the Speed Web site. "What did you see this weekend that has you fuming? Whatever it is, we want to hear about it!"
Just call "Fired Up," and rant away, angry fan!
Then there's the new replacement program for the old "Speed News." "The Speed Report" gives us more flash and dash, a whiz-bang set reminiscent of ESPN's iconic SportsCenter. Gone are the likes of Bob Varsha, Connie LeGrand, Ralph Sheheen and others; instead, we have the young and hip Drew and Nicole.
And, lo and behold, there's a segment titled "The Angry Minute." It's not a venue for fans to spout, but rather something that's more likely to incite them. It features things such as the near-violent encounter between Danny Lasoski and his father in the pits at the Knoxville Nationals after an on-track tangle between Lasoski and his nephew, Brian Brown. Brown was driving a car prepared by George Lasoski, Danny's father and Brian's grandfather.
A therapist probably helped write the disclaimers. "Before you shoot the TV or kick the dog...give us a call at 1-866-WTUNNEL and vent with a vengeance," reads the Web promotion for "Fired Up!"
But is there any merit to that notion? Does venting into your telephone for "Fired Up" or watching a Lasoski family feud or the latest Paul Tracy fisticuffs on "The Angry Minute" really make anyone less angry? Or, perhaps, does it merely stir the pot a little more?
Something tells me the producers of such programming don't lose any sleep worrying about such distinctions. As long as those numbers stay up there, baby...
September 2, 2006 | Permalink
Comments
I think David's got some great points here. If I had any reservations, though, they'd involve his treatment of Internet sites like ours at ThatsRacin.com. He's letting us off pretty lightly, I think.
Sure, TV's the big player on this block, but interactivity is a big part of our business here, too. Some readers - or "users" in the parlance - seem to like having their say. I dunno, maybe some people feel that they've been talked "down to" by the media for generations and are finally getting their chance to fire back.
Make no mistake, we encourage that interactivity here, too. But none of that changes, or even challenges, the validity of David's points.
Thanks for reading. And interacting.
Posted by: Bob Henry | Sep 2, 2006 12:58:33 PM
David,
I don't think you're giving the internet enough credit here. While TV may have a bigger audience, it's limited in that usually for 1 input you get 1 point of view. The internet allows you to search for more input and get a rounder view of an issue. You can search for facts in favor of or against an issue...TV sends what they want you to see. I think with the internet we've come full circle back to the soapbox in the town square. Blogs, Youtube, Myspace, etc are the soapboxes of today and I think it's good that people feel they can be heard.
I think I balance on DeSpain. Knowledge on one hand and arrogance on the other balances out at about 50/50. I don't seek him out on TV but if I hit the channel and he's on I might watch.
So, for anger management...
Paper media: Provides the least relief because there is no guarantee anyone will ever read it and response to it (if any) is slow and limited by the circulation.
TV media: Maybe more relief than paper because you know you were heard, but the feedback response is limited by the TV show.
Internet media: Provides the greatest relief. You can reach and/or seek out people of like or unlike opinions; Receive instant feedback (sometimes not always polite like you mentioned); The communication is two way as opposed to the basically one way communication of TV and published media...Communication is the best way to resolve issues and relieve stress.
Posted by: Keith | Sep 2, 2006 1:18:55 PM
Post a comment
Advertisements
Subscribe to this blog's feed