« The Jr. Chronicles | Main | King Of The Mountain; Dale Earnhardt Jr. »
May 12, 2007
Name and heritage
By DAVID GREEN
There's not much doubt that Dale Earnhardt Jr. is one of the biggest stars in NASCAR, if not the biggest. There's not much doubt that Junior is the biggest NASCAR-related celebrity in the mainstream world outside of the motor sports industry.
Stardom and celebrity status are achieved in a whimsical way. Dale Jr.'s is certainly tied to his name and his heritage. Once Junior took it upon himself to do what his daddy did and become a racecar driver, he probably saw the affirmation of something he already knew -- that name and heritage are a two-edged sword.
They gave him some advantages guys named Joe Public would never enjoy. They also gave him some baggage ol' Joe would never have to lug around.
All things considered, I'd say Dale Jr. came out ahead in that deal. All he has to do is handle the baggage -- and he has seemed to do a very good job of that, all along.
He has come to the biggest stumbling block to place itself in his path since February 2001, and his decision regarding the present dilemma is the stuff of much debate and second-guessing.
Junior's celebrity status causes many of us to overlook one question: Just how good is he as a driver?
To some, he's an over-hyped, no-talent bum with a reasonably good ride and an incredible amount of sponsor support. To others, he's a great driver who is victimized by a team that has slipped from a lofty spot at or near the top of the heap and is now merely marginal.
So, between those two extreme points of view, just what kind of driver is Dale Earnhardt Jr.?
From this perspective, the answer is that's he quite good.
He has won at least one race in every full season of competition in the Cup Series. He has won a good many restrictor plate races but he has also won on short tracks (Bristol and Richmond) and intermediate tracks (Texas, Atlanta, Chicago), a high-banked mile (Dover) and a flat mile (Phoenix) -- pretty much everything but a road course.
He has won as many as six races in a single season (2004) and has finished in the top five in points before (third in '03) and after (fifth, in '04 and again last year) the advent of the Chase. He was the first rookie driver to win The Winston.
Is he a candidate for nomination as racing's all-time best-ever driver? No. But he is much more than just somebody taking advantage of family advantages.
Combined with his popularity, that pretty much explains all the hubbub about him and his plans to leave the Dale Earnhardt Inc. team. Excess? Sure. That's what we do best in our culture -- overemphasize and exaggerate.
In this instance, at least, we have something that comes close to being worthy of the hyperbole.
May 12, 2007 | Permalink
Comments
Dang David I'm gald I finished the article, my first reaction was to ask...Ya wanna throw another Malatov Cocktail and the wreckage? In my personal opinion, I feel its a case of the "Tail wagging the dog", and attempt to force the hand that feeds him. Nascar will benifit from the free publicity, But I try to analyize the situation, that tend to punch holes in some stories credibilty. This could very well be "Career Suicide" for somebody!...In the mean time let's throw a tent over this circus and get BACK to Racin'
Posted by: Fan #5 | May 12, 2007 12:16:54 PM
By today's standards (I'll get to this later), Junior is good, but he's never been a consistent force throughout a season - his only great season was 2004; other than that he's had merely good seasons. 2001-3 he had his usual allotment of Talladega wins plus wins at Dover and Phoenix; since 2004 when the rest of the field figured out DEI's underside aero edge on the plate tracks he's been decidedly mediocre, with just two wins to date after 2004.
On "by today's standards," I mean that he is one of many drivers whose careers have thrived in the sport's Dead Lane Era of uncompetitive racing; he's won slugfests at Talladega but everywhere else the racing is single-file ennui - the competitiveness of the sport is less than it was before 1985, despite the growth in number of winning teams.
Posted by: Mike Daly | May 12, 2007 2:52:42 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.
Advertisements
Subscribe to this blog's feed