« Race Attendance Vs The Price of Going | Main | Kyle Busch Is King Of The Mountain »
May 10, 2008
Old Darlington
By DAVID GREEN
It's not good to have a fixation on the past, and romantic recollections of "good old days" are usually rose-tinted distortions of how those days really were. But I miss the old Darlington Raceway.
I wish I still had the tri-fold brochure advertising the 1965 Southern 500 that was once part of my racing memorabilia collection. It was new when I first got it. I examined and re-read it until its glossy paper was tattered. In my mind's eye, I can clearly see the picture of Buck Baker's Ray Fox Dodge on the way to victory in the '64 race, the 15th running of the Labor Day classic.
I had a fascination with the race and the Darlington track that was very much akin to the reverence I have always had for Indianapolis Motor Speedway and the Indy 500. I saw the the two tracks and their signature races as equals in the motor sports world.
One of my favorite memories of Darlington is the 1980 spring race, the CRC Chemicals Rebel 500. In those days, the cars were gridded on the front straightaway instead of on pit road. My media credential gave me access to the grid and I must have gotten a hundred great candid driver photos that I was able to put to good use in my job as sports editor of The Gaffney (S.C.) Ledger the rest of the year.
Standing inside Turn 4 and watching the cars thunder off the banking onto the straightaway, with the roar of engines echoing off the concrete wall and the underside of the flat roofs covering the grandstands, was mesmerizing to me. At the other end of pit road, watching the drivers maneuver into single file as they approached Turn 1, diving in and sliding up impossibly close to the steel guard rail, was equally awe-inspiring.
Years later, with International Speedway Corp. as the new owner, renovation plans were announced. The old track would be reoriented, with the finish line moving from the north straightaway to the south side of the irregular oval. A new grandstand would replace the old concrete one on what used to be the backstretch.
There wasn't enough real estate between the track and four-lane S.C. 151-34 to suitably expand the original frontstretch grandstand, planners felt.
I thought the renovation was a travesty. I have never gotten used to the flip-flopped racetrack.
But I suppose it's better than if they had plowed it up and brought in the giant cookie-cutter and installed a sanitary, 1.5-mile trioval. At least it is still Darlington, the same crotchety "Lady in Black." It still produces real racing -- by that I mean races where the action may be intense, as in a Dale Earnhardt versus Ernie Irvan duel in 1993 or '94 or the memorable Ricky Craven-Kurt Busch finish in the 2003 Carolina Dodge Dealers 400, or where the individual performance of the winner is so impressive, as when the 45-year-old (and supposedly "over the hill") Baker outfoxed the young rising stars in '64.
No, Darlington does not offer, never has and never will, the kind of racing that mainstream fans nowadays seem to prefer. There's no three-, four- or five-wide duels. There are never 3,467 lead changes in any race.
It's a classic, challenging, driver's race track. For fans who appreciate that, there's no track like it.
Thank goodness we still get one dose of it each year, even if the race starts and finishes a half-lap away from where it is supposed to.
May 10, 2008 | Permalink
Comments
kyle kicked jr but again,,,just like a red headed stepchild,,
Posted by: larry | May 10, 2008 11:15:53 PM
Congrats to Kyle Busch on his win tonight.
Hey Larry, I think, Kyle kicked more butts
than just Jr's.
I really felt for Greg Biffle, he drove his
heart out and seemed to have the car to
beat but for some reason, nothing works out
for him.
Posted by: Race Fan | May 11, 2008 12:15:48 AM
David,
Seems that they had an inkling that you would have a nostalgic yearning. Several of the cars ran "historic" paint schemes complete with engine c.i.d. and decals.
Travis Kvapil's white #28 LaFAYETTE Ford (a local Darlington ford dealer)was my favorite. If you squinted hard, it could have been Fred Lorenzen tooling his way around the track.
Darlington herself was also ready to scratch your nostalgic itch. She had more than her fair share of tricks up her sleeve to snare disrespectful suitors. Somebody had to win last night, but nobody's going to forget what it took to even finish.
Posted by: Keith | May 11, 2008 7:35:28 AM
Keith, I thought Kvapils's car was the best one out there as well. It was kind of cool seeing a car with old school lettering and a small local sponsor on it like that.
How about Harvick losing it? Ouch!
Posted by: canucken | May 11, 2008 9:59:42 AM
Hey racefan,
While your comments are sent to Hey Larry, it was larry that seems to have a "thing" for Jr.
Most of the time larry will promote some true hate toward Jr. I am not a big Jr. fan but he has handled himself so well on and off the track. So, I don't understand those who really make it personal to bash him. I did not care for his father's racing style, but why hold that against Jr.?
As for the Shrub, he certainly spanked the field after going to the rear. More than that, he destroyed the booth that said he would not finish setting the blistering pace that we saw. He won, fair n' square.
Are we watching the next Jeff Gordon? While Jeff literally put to pasture my favorite driver, Rusty.. I don't recall the disdain for him during those middle 90's in which he grew. There was rivalry with the "older guard", but I don't recall the true hate we are seeing with this kid.
David, now the track is smooth enough for the Indy cars! lol
Posted by: Larry | May 11, 2008 1:38:34 PM
Hmmmm If I didn't know I was watching Darlington I coulda swore it looked like Lowes on tv
Posted by: Fan #5 | May 11, 2008 2:50:13 PM
Hey racefan
While your comments are sent to Hey Larry,
it was larry that seems to have a "thing"
for jr.
I agree with you. I don't understand why
some fans want to bash Jr. Jr. is not Dale
Sr. and he doesn't want to be, he just
wants to be himself. If he makes a mistake
on the track, he will be the first to admit
it and apologize and when interviewed he
does it with class. Since leaving DEI and
going to HMS he has done a lot better. He
is in the top five in points. I think, his
fans have put so much pressure on him to
win a race and he knows that. He has had
to live with the Earnhardt name all of his
life and that has not been easy for him.
Jr. should only be judged for what he does
and not what his father did.
Kyle Busch won the race at Darlington fair
and square, you said it. He's a great
driver and he certainly can handle a race
car, loose or whatever. Just my opinion,
I think, the reason so many fans hate him
is because the way he comes across in his
interviews, not so much his driving style.
Yes, he could be the next Jeff Gordon.
Posted by: Race Fan | May 11, 2008 2:59:22 PM
I remember seeing races, or parts of races, from Darlington before the FIRST "modernization" of the track. This was back when a "Darlington stripe" was achieved by scraping the metal guardrail in the turns - there were no walls, just guardrails. Nowadays, a "Darlington stripe" is thought of as any scarring of the car from contact with a wall.
The track also used to have room for only one car through the turns. It led to some nasty action when a driver tried to make his car really thin to make a pass there, but then they widened the track. David, do you recall when that was? I call it the "first modernization" because I think that was done some years before they flipped the straights.
Posted by: Doug in CA | May 11, 2008 3:43:29 PM
Darlington up close and personal. What a weekend! Our seats for NW were awesome. Based on the high velocity drama of that race, our anticipation of Cup was over the top. We thought, well, if qualifying caused JJ and KK and others to falter, imagine what race time would bring. And Kennseth's mighty NW race bang took place right in front of us. WOW! Glad he was fine.
I got pit passes for my daughter's birthday gift. She and I had a great time exploring the pit areas. Even saw them inspect and weigh the #9. They had a Q&A with Bobby Allison and Junior Johnson. She got the later's autograph (being upfront to await Kahne's appearance), though she didn't realize how big Junior Johnson was. Kahne's Q&A was cool. She got pics, but he didn't sign autographs. We also got a short glimpse of Bowyer and he graciously mingled for signatures before departing. Pit passes are nice, but not worth a repeat, IMO.
It pained us greatly to see Shrub win. He whinned on and on about his brakes and yet, that didn't slow him down. Yeah, he got boo'd at high decibles and responded with antagonistic comments. I don't agree with throwing beer cans at him during his victory lap. He's just a punk, and that's being polite.
Being at Darlington was a thrill. We saw DW ride by on a golf cart and when folks waved and said hey, he completely ignored us. Saw Jeff Burton, too, but didn't linger. Can't figure out for the life of me why they can't get fighter jets for the flyover. Cripes, my F-16 base is only 40 minutes away. Those Warthogs could've been ours, but I never saw them ID'd.
Made it home by 2 a.m. I DVR'd the race and watched some highlights this morning. We sat closer to the track than I'd have liked. We were near the Gophercam and near Turn 4. We braced ourselves many, many times each as drivers scraped the wall in Turn 4. Thought for sure Kahne was toast when it was his car bumping, but thankfully, he recovered. From qualifying to racing, he mostly sucked.
Every time a cloud of smoke appeared from Turn 4 bumps, the crowd rose and waited. Except for 11 and who, the 84?, getting turned around, the cars righted and rarely brought out a caution. The difference between NW and Cup? The cars. Also, I have to say, the size of the apron makes a difference, too. Cars would swipe the wall and glide down to the apron and not interfer with the action.
One last thing. I love being AT the race. Every sense was assaulted by the speed/roar of racing. (Smell of rubber in particular.) But one element completely out of our control: seat mates. My son-in-law was on the verge of smashing a guy's face -- he was drunk and yaking and in his space ... and folks in our row kept coming and going.
We're done with being at a race, probably for a year. An event we were so eager to experience, and several doofuses made it kinda miserable. Like anything, it's a matter of balance.
Oh, and to David -- wish I'd have known the "old" Darlington. We sat on pit wall, looked at the pavement and got lost in the wonder.
Posted by: Doris | May 11, 2008 4:37:40 PM
Doug,
Now tell me California deserves that second race.
Larry,
There are Big "L"arry's and little "l"arry's in the blog world, but ya know, little l, must really like that Jr. He just can't seem to help himself from comparing anything that happens to what happened to Jr. He's a true Jr fan.
Posted by: Keith | May 11, 2008 5:34:42 PM
Doris you can do what I do when I order tickets...ask for the "Non- Stupid" section...must of been the same rubes I had at Lowe's last year...Drunk and Obnoxious!
Posted by: Fan #5 | May 11, 2008 10:08:12 PM
Seemed like a rather typical Darlington. Couldn't pass for shit - never can - track position is everything.
Old, newer, newest...I don't think the racing there has ever changed that much, nor will it unless they widen the racing surface.
That's not to say it isn't good racin'. I think every once in a while you need a track like that, and you know to expect that at the Lady.
When it's unaccapetable is when a track that is known for side by side and fender to fender (say...Atlanta) puts on a Darlingtonesque performance.
But, it was good. It was Darlington. I've never seen a bad race there.
And...other than the surface color...the surface still raced the same. they still slid all over the place and tried to widen the outside groove by moving the wall with the side of the car.
Smoother? Yep.
Tamer? Nope.
Posted by: the6and9 | May 11, 2008 10:25:05 PM
Hey, guys -- thanks to all for posting. I've got some kind of respiratory crud and have been sleeping most of the day. Sorry for not responding sooner. Looks as if there's no big differences of opinion among most of the observations.
Keith -- Oh, yeah. I loved that 28. Fearless Fred was one of my early faves.
Larry -- I'd love to see Indy cars back at Darlington. USAC's Champ Cars ran there a couple of times in the '50s and NASCAR had an Indy-type series in the old days, featuring open-wheel single-seaters with stock-block engines. Buck Baker won the championship in what, as far as I know, was the only season held, in '52 I believe.
Doug, there was a moderate revision of the track that resulted in the present 1.366-mile measured length in 1970. The year before, the track was listed as 1.375 (or 1-3/8) miles. When it originally opened, it was called a 1-1/4, and in 1954, it was designated as 1-3/8. None of the changes in the track over the years really had much impact on the nature of it. As speeds have gone up, things have certainly changed; they used to race on that wide apron Doris mentioned. But the fastest guys have always been up against the outer perimeter.
Doris -- I sure envy you your experience this weekend! It's a brighter and shinier place nowadays, compared to the old days. That was part of its charm.
Posted by: David Green | May 11, 2008 11:43:55 PM
Keith, where do you come from with this "tell me Ca deserves a second race?" I never said that. I remain firmly in the "give Labor Day back to Darlington" camp. I do, though, find it hard to argue with David Poole (?) when he points out at Darlington selling out 100% of its 60,000 seats doesn't compare with Fontana selling 80% of its 100,000: it's still 60,000 vs 80,000. My solution? Labor Day goes back to Darlington, while Fontana takes Atlanta's chase date. Hey, it's business.
I drove from Phoenix to LA this past weekend and meant to stop at PIR to get some pictures, but I had a 7 hour drive in front of me, so passed on the chance. Oh well...
Posted by: Doug in CA | May 12, 2008 1:02:19 AM
Post a comment
Advertisements
Subscribe to this blog's feed