« Situation ethics on the racetrack | Main | Just Shut Up Kyle.......Carl Is Coming. »
August 25, 2008
Chase V My Yearly Diatribe
By Keith Ott
Yes, it is
that time of year where I wax poetic about the evil NASCAR event. First, in case anyone is in doubt about my
position on the (ugh, and I hate to type it) Chase. I just did a quick self check, and yep, I’m
against it. It’s a bad format for
racing. All the reasons wherein one might
need a playoff are moot, as far as racing is concerned. The Playoff will never become a must see
racing event, and as far as I know, no-one ever plans a Chase party, so it’s
not really much of a fan event either.
- Who needs a playoff? : The
NFL, NBA, NHL, Baseball, and the SWNVL (Swedish Women Naked Volleyball League)
need playoffs because they all can’t play each other at the same time under
equal conditions. A playoff equalizes
those factors, and okay, the SWNVL needs a playoff because there’s nothing else
to do in Sweden, and it gets lots of votes. This isn’t so in NASCAR, or racing in general. Every team plays every other team, every
week. There are no easy schedules or
home team advantages. They see each
other every week. They earned the spots
they’re in. If you’re #12 you’re there
because after 26 races that’s the effort your team put out. I don’t care if your name is Earnhardt,
Allison or Petty, if you’re #12, you don’t deserve a shot at #1.
- It’s a 36 race season: But,
hey, let’s just throw away those
first 26 weeks. Why do we even have a
season? We know at the start of the
season, or pretty much so, who the best 10 or so teams are. Why waste all that time and gas on 26 races
we don’t need? Now, it seems to me that some sort of ratio
of Wins/Consistency is what NASCAR fans want for a Champion. Then why a playoff? The #24 had all that, and a huge point lead
going into the Chase last year. So, and no
I really don’t like him, his consistency and winning gave him about a 700 pt lead
at one time, but no, not with the playoff. Inconsistent, during the early 26,
JJ came on with late wins and had a solid Chase. So, Gordon’s solid 26 weeks was trumped by
Johnsons late run. Of course if NASCAR
hadn’t adjusted the points, the guy who earned the title would have won. Twenty-six weeks of solid racing thrown into
the dumpster. A NASCAR racing Champion
should be someone who has shown, throughout ALL 36 weeks, I repeat, throughout ALL 36 weeks, that he/she has been there, with the team, and they
got it done with wins and consistency. A
NASCAR Champion isn’t a ten week wonder, or, IMO, it shouldn’t be.
- A Playoff with no consequences: Getting into the playoffs is an honor, I
suppose. But, we all know that there are
not 12 guys that belong there. The 12th
place guy will garner over $1million more than the 13th placed guy,
even if he squeaked into 12th by just a point. #12 can then suck butt the rest of the season and still have that cool
million. That, my friend, is pure BS. Stewart missed the playoff in 2006, raced hard, and, in real points,
would have finished the season in 6th, I believe. The very premise of a playoff involves
consequences. You win or you don’t go
on. If they want a playoff then they
need to whittle down the opportunities, so that at the end only the best, and
I’m going with 5, are there. Them thar
other pretenders lose their fake NASCAR points and are thrown back into the
reality shark pit with the points they actually earned.
- Road races in the Playoff: Sure,
why not? I’m for it, with a caveat. No “Ringers.” The regular season is over and road races
were a part of it. A Road course can be
part of the playoffs also, but I think the drivers should have participated in
at least 80% of the regular season’s races to qualify. The playoff is no time for a veteran road
racer to audition for a NASCAR ride possibly at the expense of influencing a
Championship. Road racers may be, okay
are, excellent drivers, but this is our playoff, our championship stretch, and
part timers should not be allowed.
- A no win Champion: While
Matt may have set the bar for a consistency championship, he did have a
win. If you want to see how much fans
love this Chase, let a non-winner take the title. NASCAR has never had one, but the Chase makes
it more likely.
NASCAR’s
Chase has no business in racing. Its
purpose was solely to inflate TV ratings and put more green in the wallet. Race fans aren’t stupid and NASCAR, try as it
does, isn’t the WWF. Get over the State
Fair/Carnival attitude, NASCAR. You’re
not a Mom and Pop operation any longer, and if you continue to steer this
course, pushing the sport/entertainment envelope, you will lose fans. All sports are entertainment, but all
entertainments are not sports. Again,
JMO, and you might have a different one. What, and I put a few ideas in there, would you do to fix it? Then again, you might not think it’s
broken. You feel free to tell me to STFU,
but be ready for an answer. You all have
a fine NAVY day!
Note: Tomorrow my first girl is poppin’ out my first little grandsailor/rugrat. I have to hit sporting good stores, and I have to buy masks to change diapers. Posting will be sporadic.
August 25, 2008 | Permalink
Comments
Why not road races in the playoff? Here's why not - they are worthless competitively and are NEVER a credible gauge of a racer's ability. On road courses the driver drives the car and races the track; on superspeedways racers race for the win. Racing is not about racing the track.
You're right about the utter worthlessness of a playoff format - it is a total contrivance that accomplishes nothing. The Chase was a response to the weaknesses of the Latford Point System that doesn't even address those weaknesses, which are that there is nowhere close to enough reward for winning races and leading laps and the champion is determined solely by a mediocre measurement of best-average-finish. There never should have been a Chase to begin with; the change should be to increase race winner and lap leader bonuses to make the championship mathematically impossible without most wins and most laps led.
Posted by: Mike Daly | Aug 25, 2008 5:39:26 PM
What else to say but I agree, I agree, I agree, Keith...but then you already knew that.
Posted by: Kari | Aug 25, 2008 5:57:44 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.
Advertisements
Subscribe to this blog's feed