« Blocking is the culprit | Main | A plug for underdog Jeff Burton »
October 10, 2008
The Bump Drafting Debate
By Mark Young and
Keith Ott
With
the Presidential race heating up and having to deal with all the hype
surrounding the debates, Keith and I have put together our own debate regarding
NASCAR. This week’s discussion…….Bump
Drafting. To some it is a necessary evil
while to others it has grown into a two-headed monster. Check out what we have to say and weigh in
with your thoughts.
What has NASCAR done regarding bump drafting?
Keith: NASCAR has a big dilemma with the BD because
it’s big TV. No-one confesses to wanting the big one, but it’s good TV.
Mark: NASCAR has a dilemma with BD because they
have designed a car that invites drivers to do it. The big one is a result of restrictor plates,
not the bumpers. Those guys would find
other ways to have a big one.
Bump drafting has been used for a while? Why is it so bad now?
Keith: There
has always been the bump, but BD evolved because of the last decade’s car’s
aero. It couldn’t pass, or passing was made easier with the bump.
It became accepted.
Mark: Bump drafting has been around as long as the
restrictor plate. Like Keith said the
aero packages NASCAR has mandated. The
BD used to be an art used at the right time at the right place. It has become necessary in order to pass.
Why is bump drafting so much different now
than in the past?
Keith: BD, accepted or not, had consequences with the old car. There was
a known penalty to pay because the bumpers didn’t align back to front…caution
was needed.
Mark: Like
Keith mentioned, with the old-style cars the bumpers didn’t line up. Hit the guy in front too hard and you would
be replacing a radiator or blow up. But
NASCAR allowed teams to reinforce the bumper regions of the chassis and bump
drafting became slam drafting.
Keith: The CON has no such limitation. It
still can’t pass, but, it’s a perfect bumping machine. Everything lines
up and if the car can’t race to the front…Let’s bump it up there.
Mark: I have to disagree here Keith, the CON can pass. Did you see Almirola and Earnhardt hook up and look like a missile through 3 and 4 on the high side? They bump draft because the plate levels the field engine-wise.
Keith: Just
where did Amirola and Jr. finish? The
draft is viable, the bump is viable, but 43 cars pretending they belong at
Busch Gardens isn’t racing. Ask Carl.
But doesn’t bump drafting make for better
racing?
Mark: It doesn’t create better racing. The problem is with the plate. Give these guys a little more power and then
the slingshot pass will be back. Give
them more power and they will spread out thus creating room to pass and, in
situations where handling is an issue, will require the use of lifting the gas
and using the brakes.
Keith: It’s not racing if it’s the only venue for passing. I mean guys with all that talent, driving that closely, have to push or be pushed to the front. That’s not racing.
If you could change something at the restrictor plate tracks what would it be?
Mark: Like I mentioned in the last question, I
would open the holes in the restrictor plate and let these guys really
race. The pack would thin out and
drafting would mean something. We would
still see the bump but it would be used differently.
Keith: I’d want softer noses, or rear panels.
Something to put more thought and consequence back into the bump.
Keith: What
Presidential race? Tell me they are not
going to make that old guy try to run! What if he goes below the yellow line?
October 10, 2008 | Permalink
Comments
Hey K&M,
There is an "Art" to bump drafting. There are only a handful of drivers that have developed ability to be effective with the bump draft. This still holds, even with the new car. Mistakes with the old car were certainly easier to make, but as we saw last week there is a right and wrong time and place.
The bump draft can be a tool to help drivers compete and pass. But, when the evil cousin "Bang" shows up..all hell breaks loose.
If we lost the plates and lowered cubic inches, real racing would break out with the old slingshot. But, be careful what you wish for. The large packs with 3 and 4 wide racing would be gone after each start and re-start. Plate racing is a great show and would be better if they just paid big bucks, and no points. Leave it for what it is. A show.
Posted by: Larry | Oct 10, 2008 3:44:52 PM
Larry,
Mistakes are mistakes, my take is that the CON is too forgiving. Why use or develop racing skills to pass, when you can just boot'em in the ass. It's not "will" bang show up, but "when will" bang show up.
If we lost the plates and lowered cubic inches, real racing would break out with the old slingshot. - Larry
How about we lose the plates; keep the CI's and use lower compression or cam lift to control the HP? Plates are a great way to keep speeds down. They also suck any kind of engine response from the car. Lowered, unrestricted, HP might allow some actual racing moves. The car would actually respond to the driver.
Leave the super speedways alone as a TV gimmick? The day they make SS racing into a made for TV show, with no points, is the day I start watching baseball.
Posted by: Keith | Oct 10, 2008 5:42:59 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.
Advertisements
Subscribe to this blog's feed